Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Sports Betting (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   Scalf (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=366491)

lorinda 10-27-2005 07:26 AM

Scalf
 
I hope he's only banned from OOT.

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Lori

IHateKeithSmart 10-28-2005 12:19 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Huh? What happened? They should be easier on us south carolinians.

Cancer Merchant 10-28-2005 02:48 PM

Re: Scalf
 
There's no way to just ban from one forum, so he's probably gone for good. Indiana got the shaft as well.

stickman 10-28-2005 02:49 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Why were they banned?

10-28-2005 02:50 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Thats horse [censored] ! TECH! Free Scalfie!!!

Cancer Merchant 10-28-2005 02:52 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Trolling OOT. The mods there have a low tolerance for douchebaggery.

10-28-2005 03:03 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
Trolling OOT. The mods there have a low tolerance for douchebaggery.

[/ QUOTE ]

It just the guy named [censored] he has assumed absolute power and decided that he can ban people based his personal interest.

llabb 10-28-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Run a search for scalf's posts, and it's pretty easy to find. OOT has been on a crackdown for a while now. It's pretty much covered in [censored]'s guide to the forum stickied at the top. Not a friendly place for newbies. When scalf stopped on by over there, you can imagine that his posts weren't welcomed. You gotta admit, it takes some getting used to the guy, until you realize he's solid.

He made a weird comment about OOT itself, and then followed that up by talking about racism as a positive value. Exactly the kind of stuff that [censored] will ban you for.

Anyway, I also hope he's only banned from OOT. Perhaps Lori or someone else who is recognized in that forum can PM [censored] and ask for scalf to be reinstated, but banned from OOT. That seems to be [censored]'s customary policy, to ban somebody to get their attention, then reinstate them on the grounds that they either never repeat the offense, or never post in OOT again, under threat of permanent banning.

I'm not recognized in OOT, in fact, doubt I'm recognized anywhere since I don't post a ton, so I'd rather that others ask for scalf's reinstatement. So who's gonna PM [censored]?

ElSapo 10-28-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
I hope he's only banned from OOT.

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

What was he banned for?The racism post? While most people would disagree, it's just an idea.

OOT is quickly developing a really thin skin, which is ironic given the forum's past. I looked at Scalf's last few posts and couldn't see anything worth banning him over.

ElSapo

Smackdab 10-28-2005 03:29 PM

Re: Scalf
 
2+2 having moderators was not a bad idea. However the execution of having mods is poor. Take a test, become a mod and then exercise fascit powers to spit on the first amendment. I suppose now I'll be banned.

NoChance 10-28-2005 03:31 PM

Re: Scalf
 
I read the last few posts by both Indiana and Scalf. I didn't even see anything offensive at all. I've seen TONS of stuff in there much worse.

It's hard to believe a guy can be banned for saying, "I'm just trolling here..." when you see some of the topics discussed and pictures posted there. Some real backwards rules there. They tear every subject apart and can't even get a simple concept right.

Lori 10-28-2005 03:37 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[censored] can ban people just from OOT by sending a PM basically saying "You are banned from OOT, if you post there again you will be banned from 2+2"

I don't think the politics of that forum are worth debating as there are obvious plus and minus points and they have been done to death over there. What I do hope is that [censored] is aware that scalf is a valuable poster on the rest of 2+2.

Lori

lastsamurai 10-28-2005 03:43 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Thats why i really hate posting there....

Cancer Merchant 10-28-2005 03:46 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
2+2 having moderators was not a bad idea. However the execution of having mods is poor. Take a test, become a mod and then exercise fascit powers to spit on the first amendment. I suppose now I'll be banned.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh.

10-28-2005 03:49 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Not a shock considering some of the stuff scalf has posted in oot. [censored] is banning left and right.

All scalf has to do is create another username (NotScalf ?).
I, for example, have been here a lot longer than since 08/07/05. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Lori 10-28-2005 03:53 PM

Re: Scalf
 
I certainly wouldn't ask [censored] to allow scalf to post in OOT, that's entirely [censored]'s choice.

I just hope he's aware that scalfie is not worthy of a site-wide ban (if indeed that's what scalf got... we don't know for sure of course)

I have PM'd [censored] to ask if he knows that scalf is valuable elsewhere. He may be working on incomplete information.

Lori

mrbaseball 10-28-2005 04:14 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
Trolling OOT. The mods there have a low tolerance for douchebaggery

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought OOT was founded on douchebaggery?

Lori 10-28-2005 04:17 PM

Re: Scalf
 
I need someone who knows scalf to get him to get in touch with me. I think I've reached an agreement with [censored]

Lori

llabb 10-28-2005 04:25 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
I need someone who knows scalf to get him to get in touch with me. I think I've reached an agreement with [censored]

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

Good work, Lori.

Cancer Merchant 10-28-2005 04:26 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Trolling OOT. The mods there have a low tolerance for douchebaggery

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought OOT was founded on douchebaggery?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but it got out of hand. Too many dicks and assholes crapping everywhere. A Team America style (nsfw) campaign has since ensued, with plenty of collateral damage.

Easy E 10-28-2005 05:25 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Neither of those posts seemed worthy of a draconian measure in my opinion.
[censored] PM'd me with a statement that we shouldn't assume that those posts were the reason for scalf's ban.

Just letting you know.

10-28-2005 05:32 PM

Re: Scalf
 

[ QUOTE ]
[censored] PM'd me with a statement that we shouldn't assume that those posts were the reason for scalf's ban.



[/ QUOTE ]

Oh I just assumed Scalf posted somethign that was different from [censored] point of view...oh wait that is what happened.

chiachu 10-28-2005 05:50 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Trolling OOT. The mods there have a low tolerance for douchebaggery

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought OOT was founded on douchebaggery?

[/ QUOTE ]

fooled me too [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

and i just figured out how to decode his posts too [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

dankhank 10-28-2005 05:51 PM

Re: Scalf
 
how did that [censored] guy become a mod anyway? not that i read OOT much, but in reading his posts in other forums he seems like this weird lonely butthead who would be the last guy you'd ever expect to be a mod. not only because he'd be bad at it, but because you'd never expect anyone to elect him there.

bills217 10-28-2005 06:00 PM

Re: Scalf
 
We want Scalf! We want Scalf! We want Scalf!

kyro 10-28-2005 08:27 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
how did that [censored] guy become a mod anyway? not that i read OOT much, but in reading his posts in other forums he seems like this weird lonely butthead who would be the last guy you'd ever expect to be a mod. not only because he'd be bad at it, but because you'd never expect anyone to elect him there.

[/ QUOTE ]

He can be a complete dick, I've told him that straight up.

That being said, he has done wonders for OOT. I realize scalfie is a fan favorite around here, and rightfully so, but the stuff he posted in OOT was pretty lame and I have no problem with [censored]'s decision provided scalfie can continue to post on the rest of the board.

MyTurn2Raise 10-28-2005 08:43 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
Neither of those posts seemed worthy of a draconian measure in my opinion.
[censored] PM'd me with a statement that we shouldn't assume that those posts were the reason for scalf's ban.

Just letting you know.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was he ghost-bumping?

kyro 10-28-2005 09:07 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Neither of those posts seemed worthy of a draconian measure in my opinion.
[censored] PM'd me with a statement that we shouldn't assume that those posts were the reason for scalf's ban.

Just letting you know.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was he ghost-bumping?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. I'll post the links if I can find them. But he made some really retarded threads with no content whatsoever.

NoChance 10-28-2005 09:23 PM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
No. I'll post the links if I can find them. But he made some really retarded threads with no content whatsoever.

[/ QUOTE ]

How is that any different than 90% of what is in there every day?

CCx 10-28-2005 11:28 PM

Re: Scalf
 
i love scalf's posts here, i really hope he's allowed to post at least in just this one forum again, he's an okay guy

free scalfie!

IHateKeithSmart 10-29-2005 12:24 AM

Re: Scalf
 
Complete bs. I find scalfies posts here both helpful and hilarious, which is a good combination.

kyro 10-29-2005 02:28 AM

Re: Scalf
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No. I'll post the links if I can find them. But he made some really retarded threads with no content whatsoever.

[/ QUOTE ]

How is that any different than 90% of what is in there every day?

[/ QUOTE ]

You're wrong. I'm not saying there's always intelligent stuff in there, but for the most part it is stuff that can generate discussion. I think scalf just went in and babbled a bunch of nonsense and ended with a bunch of graemlins.

Honestly, I hope he comes back. He's beginning to grow on me, but if he's not contributing ANYTHING to OOT, he's going to get banned. You don't have to like it, but that's the way things are being run nowadays.

$DEADSEXE$ 10-29-2005 02:53 AM

Re: Scalf
 
Whats the big deal? can't he just create a new account and post away?
He can call himself...Flacs

NoChance 10-29-2005 03:41 AM

Re: Scalf
 
It's just a popularity contest in there.

What some find interesting others may not. What some think are vulgar, others may not. What some find interesting, others may not. By moderating based on these things, it just comes down to whether you are liked or not. It's really pretty sad. I honestly don't care. I'm just pointing out that these things are all left to interpretation and are things that cannot be defined clearly.

natedogg 10-29-2005 03:50 AM

Moderators are lame
 
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...v=#Post3724153

It bears repeating

natedogg

10-29-2005 08:19 AM

Re: Moderators are lame
 
So does clicking on the "URL" thing so you don't screw up a thread.

NajdorfDefense 10-29-2005 12:10 PM

Re: Moderators are lame
 
[ QUOTE ]
So does clicking on the "URL" thing so you don't screw up a thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Free Scalfie! This is ridiculous, he's been a great poster here for years and years.

naj

[censored] 10-29-2005 08:06 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Scalf will be unbanned sometime this weekend.

Thank you to those who took the time to contact me and make his case.

CCx 10-29-2005 08:07 PM

Re: Scalf
 
sweet, thanks for unbanning him

lastsamurai 10-31-2005 09:11 PM

Re: Scalf
 
Thanks for unbanning him! I really need to see his picks and hope he picked opposite of me! ++EV [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.