Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Who would win? Genocide Edition (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=351367)

istewart 10-05-2005 10:12 PM

Who would win? Genocide Edition
 

istewart 10-05-2005 10:12 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
And is it close?

Cancer Merchant 10-05-2005 10:13 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
You lose

Voltron87 10-05-2005 10:16 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
what exactly is poll one asking?

NLSoldier 10-05-2005 10:19 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
what exactly is poll one asking?

[/ QUOTE ]

which one the most ppl died in?

PoBoy321 10-05-2005 10:19 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

Matty 10-05-2005 10:21 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]Recent archeological finds have shown that slave children worked so hard that their spines literally snapped. That's pretty hardcore.

kenberman 10-05-2005 10:22 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stalin is estimated to have killed 20 million Russians. most people have no concept/realization of this.

peterchi 10-05-2005 10:23 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
I don't understand the first question.

The second one is probably the Native Americans, but there are a lot of variables to consider. Do the slaves get weapons? Or do they at least get unshackled? Do the Jews still have their money, or are they already in the concentration camps?

Despite the fact that Africans were chosen as slaves because their bodies could handle the brutal conditions better than the Native Americans, if they're coming straight out of slavedom to fight, then they don't stand a chance.

The Native Americans are trained warriers since birth. If they are fighting against anyone without gun powder, then no, it's not close.

stabn 10-05-2005 10:26 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
I went with native americans on both and i'm pretty sure i'm right.

La Brujita 10-05-2005 10:28 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
This post is so f#cking tasteless.

istewart 10-05-2005 10:29 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
The first question is simply asking if slavery said "whatchu lookin' at stingy nigga" to the Holocaust, who would end up winning?

istewart 10-05-2005 10:30 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
This post is so f#cking tasteless.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have no conception of how OOT works.

istewart 10-05-2005 10:30 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stalin is estimated to have killed 20 million Russians. most people have no concept/realization of this.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is correct.

PoBoy321 10-05-2005 10:33 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]

The first question is simply asking if slavery said "whatchu lookin' at stingy nigga" to the Holocaust, who would end up winning?

[/ QUOTE ]

At first I thought "this post is probably a little off-color, but it could be a legitimate question.

Now, you should really just die.

TTChamp 10-05-2005 10:34 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
There is no way the Holocaust even comes close to the destruction of the Native Americans in terms of number of dead or injustice.

I could see an arguement for choosing slavery in that slavery occurred over an extended time period and the attrocities affected the most people. This is especially true if you mean the history of slavery throughout the entire world for all time. If you just mean slavery in America, then I think you have to go with the destruction of the Indians as the winner (but it is close).

istewart 10-05-2005 10:35 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

The first question is simply asking if slavery said "whatchu lookin' at stingy nigga" to the Holocaust, who would end up winning?

[/ QUOTE ]

At first I thought "this post is probably a little off-color, but it could be a legitimate question.

Now, you should really just die.

[/ QUOTE ]

Kill yourself.

PoBoy321 10-05-2005 10:37 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
It's cool. I'm just glad you can make light of the deaths of ~20 million people and still sleep at night.

La Brujita 10-05-2005 10:39 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
You have no conception of how OOT works.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have been around this site a long time and I just see you as an immature idiotic college kid. Wow making a thread like this really makes you cool.

istewart 10-05-2005 10:39 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
Do you scream at the TV when Jerry Seinfeld says "and what's the deal with cancer?"

Los Feliz Slim 10-05-2005 10:39 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
Getting offended by anything around here is an exercise in futility.

I question #1, I judge each in terms of awfulness, which takes into account malice and intent. Holocaust pwns.

Question #2 is close. I would think Indians would have larger numbers and be better equipped, but I could be wrong.

istewart 10-05-2005 10:40 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You have no conception of how OOT works.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have been around this site a long time and I just see you as an immature idiotic college kid. Wow making a thread like this really makes you cool.

[/ QUOTE ]

Guess what? LEAVE OOT. Nobody cares. And yes I made this thread to be cool.

[censored] 10-05-2005 10:40 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
This post is so f#cking tasteless.

[/ QUOTE ]

How so?

[censored] 10-05-2005 10:42 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This post is so f#cking tasteless.

[/ QUOTE ]

How so?

[/ QUOTE ]

nevemind, I saw his explanation for the first question.

Cancer Merchant 10-05-2005 10:42 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stalin is estimated to have killed 20 million Russians. most people have no concept/realization of this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mao pwns all of these, but nobody cares about the wogs.

GoblinMason (Craig) 10-05-2005 10:43 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/cmason/www/whambulance.jpg

mslif 10-05-2005 10:43 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stalin is estimated to have killed 20 million Russians. most people have no concept/realization of this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nobody ever mention the genocide of the Armenians by the Turcs. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

peachy 10-05-2005 10:43 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
the holocaust is way over estimated here

Cancer Merchant 10-05-2005 10:45 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming that for the first poll you meant "What is the worst event in human history" I think that it's the Holocaust and it isn't close.

For the 2nd, I voted Indians, but I suppose that it would depend on which tribe.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stalin is estimated to have killed 20 million Russians. most people have no concept/realization of this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nobody ever mention the genocide of the Armenians by the Turcs. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Or Rwanda, the Sudan. Never Again my ass. Sadly, man is his own worst enemy.

Screw this. Where's my chalupa?

mslif 10-05-2005 10:45 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
the holocaust is way over estimated here

[/ QUOTE ]

How so?

stabn 10-05-2005 10:45 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
the holocaust is way over estimated here

[/ QUOTE ]

You are wrong on this. However, the other two are currently underestimated.

istewart 10-05-2005 10:46 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
I initially voted "Holocaust" and "slaves" but am thinking both may be wrong after reading the responses. I think I underestimated those Apaches.

Paluka 10-05-2005 10:46 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
Do you scream at the TV when Jerry Seinfeld says "and what's the deal with cancer?"

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a great example. This poll is at least as interesting, funny, and witty as anything Jerry Seinfeld ever did.

Matty 10-05-2005 10:50 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You have no conception of how OOT works.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have been around this site a long time and I just see you as an immature idiotic high school kid.

[/ QUOTE ]FYP

raisins 10-05-2005 10:50 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
Nobody ever mention the genocide of the Armenians by the Turcs.

[/ QUOTE ]

True. Still we are talking somewhere in the neighborhood of 1.5 million. Hardly a contender with the heavy hitters in this thread.

raisins

LeatherFace 10-05-2005 10:52 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
Most of the indians died because of diseases, sure our ancestors probably wanted them dead, but should that count?
I voted the indians would win in the fight but if the jews, slaves, and indians were all 5 years old then I think the slaves would win.

10-05-2005 10:52 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
The first question is simply asking if slavery said "Howdy fellas! I'm 42 years young. My name is Squeak and I live on a small farm in Central Western Ohio. I raise pet store animals for a living. I like to play a little pool and I bowl a little. I like comedy movies and I watch WCW wrestling. I make native american crafts and enjoy pow wow's and rendevous. I am looking for someone in the area that would like to date and be friends. Someone that is HONEST, TRUSTWORTHY, and RELIABLE." to the Holocaust, who would end up winning?

[/ QUOTE ]

FiP

istewart 10-05-2005 10:52 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
but if the jews, slaves, and indians were all 5 years old then I think the slaves would win.


[/ QUOTE ]

Please elaborate.

stabn 10-05-2005 10:54 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
I initially voted "Holocaust" and "slaves" but am thinking both may be wrong after reading the responses. I think I underestimated those Apaches.

[/ QUOTE ]

You did.

10-05-2005 10:54 PM

Re: Who would win? Genocide Edition
 
[ QUOTE ]
Do you scream at the TV when the antennae bend themselves into horns, and the screen itself tears into a Satanic, fanged mouth?

[/ QUOTE ]

FiP


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.