Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   War on Iran? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=31288)

nicky g 03-24-2003 11:24 AM

War on Iran?
 
There's been some talk about this, and Iran was included in the Axis of Evil: does anyone think this is likely, and would anyone support it? For the record: while I'm against the Iraqi war, I can at least see the arguments for it and think it certainly will have a lot of benefits if it goes well. But a war against Iran... that would set the world on fire, and would be absurdly unjustified. I think this would up the stakes ten-fold, and would be the height of insanity and unprovoked aggression. What do people think?

brad 03-24-2003 01:28 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
operation liberate <insert country here>

Parmenides 03-24-2003 03:53 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
I've decided to join people like Jimbo and back G.W> BUSH.
Every country but Russia is seeking WMD. We MUST military attack every country in the world but Russia as soon as possible!

Jimbo 03-24-2003 03:55 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
You are on the right track Parmenides but why would you leave out Russia? Can't we just save them for desert?

brad 03-24-2003 04:00 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
'Can't we just save them for desert?'

freudian slip? heh

Jimbo 03-24-2003 04:11 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Actually it was the best choice to get across my double entendre. If I had used dessert the adding meaning would likely have been missed. Thanks for noticing Brad! [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

morgan 03-24-2003 04:14 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
"But a war against Iran... that would set the world on fire, and would be absurdly unjustified."

Outside the US this is the general concensus about this war.

As far as whether or not we will go to Iran, well that depends heavily on how successful this war is.

Morgan

B-Man 03-24-2003 04:22 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
I think North Korea is next. If we go after Iran next, too many lefties will see that as proof that we are specifically targetting Arabs/Muslims. In addition, North Korea is far more of a threat than Iran (or any other rogue state I can think of).

I think Afghanistan/The Taliban was target practice, Iraq is a step up in terms of practice for our military/testing of new weapons, and North Korea will be the toughest test of the three for our military (assuming they don't come to their senses and go back to the arrangement where they took our money & aid in exchange for not working on nukes).

If Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons, then I think we need to do whatever needs to be done to persuade them to stop working on them. The same applies to North Korea. No additional countries should be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, the world is already dangerous enough. If they wont take money or aid in exchange for dropping their nuke program, then I think a limited preemptive military strike against their nuclear reactors would be a good thing (similar to what Israel did to Iraq circa 1980).

BruceZ 03-24-2003 04:40 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Although Iran may be more of a threat than Iraq, it is a lower priority for military action because there is a good chance that forces within Iran will cause a regime change. Young people in Iran are largely pro-American.

IrishHand 03-24-2003 07:05 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Young people in Iran are largely pro-American.
Iran is a country in the Middle East, not a town in Texas.

BruceZ 03-24-2003 07:16 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
I know where Iran is, and I understand feelings of the young people there. Do you?

brad 03-24-2003 09:20 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
obviously youve never been to south texas, where the majority of the people are not american ! [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img] heh

Clarkmeister 03-24-2003 09:23 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Pssssst. Brad. He lives there. [img]/forums/images/icons/smirk.gif[/img]

brad 03-24-2003 09:27 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
well then he knows its true. you dont see him denying it [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

BruceZ 03-24-2003 09:50 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
I don't live in Texas, but hardly anyone where I live is American.

Parmenides 03-24-2003 10:09 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Russia already has those weapons. They are not seeking them. They are the only country that can tie us in a nuclear war.

The next countries that the USA sould invade are Iran, Indonesia, South Africa, Cuba, France, Germany, and Japan, and China.

We should just nuke North Korea immediately. Kim Dong says that he would win a nuclear war. Let's call his bluff.

brad 03-24-2003 10:12 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
waht about israel?

Parmenides 03-24-2003 10:21 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
The Israelis are like X-files super soldiers. We should use them to knock off the Germans. That way they get some good old fashioned revenge.

They already have weapons of mass destruction. They are not seeking them. Actually, they use the USA's. That is where we always test out our equipment against the Russians' equipment.

Stu Pidasso 03-24-2003 10:34 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
When we are done in Iraq, look at where all our troops are going to be situated. Iran is going to be surrounded with American forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, and in the Persian Gulf. Do you think this happened as a matter of chance or by design?

Stu

brad 03-24-2003 10:42 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Iran, Indonesia, South Africa, Cuba, France, Germany, and Japan, and China.

well South Africa, France, and Japan, and China have nukes too.

MMMMMM 03-24-2003 11:57 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
Why do you think we need the missile shield?

brad 03-24-2003 11:59 PM

Re: War on Iran?
 
you know im starting to come around on that missile shield idea [img]/forums/images/icons/smile.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.