DrDizzOOM
 

If some 2+2er is this screenname at Party, would you mind send a PM?

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
If some 2+2er is this screenname at Party, would you mind send a PM?

[/ QUOTE ]

1) DrDizzoom ain't no 2plus2er.
2) Fold AJo for three bets in the SB, all else being equal.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

um him a 2+2er....? please...

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Ok. I thought he might be some old timer trying out new "LAG" style. After tonight I should have a 1000 hands on this guy so I can better see how he plays.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
Ok. I thought he might be some old timer trying out new "LAG" style. After tonight I should have a 1000 hands on this guy so I can better see how he plays.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's ultra-LAG. We all know it.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

He is a solid winner in my DB but I really doubt 2+2.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

are you serious? hes on my fish list

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

The 500 hands I have on him show him winning alot of bb/100, but his stats are extremely LAG. 22+ PFR%, over 40 VP$P & really poor blind play.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I never said he was good, just a winner over 3K hands.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Why? /v

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I have 639 hands on him after tonight:

VP$P 37.40 bb/100: 6.79 W$SD:48.54 PFR:21.60
hes really lag in blinds as well: FSBTS:45.00 FBBTS:15.79

Me vs. Him: 45/68 & he is up 8.4BB

After tonight though I have him pretty well pegged. He raised A3 off UTG I 3bet JJ from the SB. When he turned a 2nd 3 I realized he was really LAG so I asked him if that was a standard play for him and his response was "no, but against you it is" I then proceeded to pound on him for the next 45 minutes until he had lost 20BB and left the table.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have 639 hands on him after tonight:

VP$P 37.40 bb/100: 6.79 W$SD:48.54 PFR:21.60
hes really lag in blinds as well: FSBTS:45.00 FBBTS:15.79

Me vs. Him: 45/68 & he is up 8.4BB

After tonight though I have him pretty well pegged. He raised A3 off UTG I 3bet JJ from the SB. When he turned a 2nd 3 I realized he was really LAG so I asked him if that was a standard play for him and his response was "no, but against you it is" I then proceeded to pound on him for the next 45 minutes until he had lost 20BB and left the table.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm disappointed you thought he was 2+2. His play would bring shame to these forums.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

It is a bit embarassing, but I didn't have much of a read when I first posted. He was playing tight & really well earlier tonight & had only showed down premium hands. After updating PT & whatnot I realize what he truly is & I'm ashamed that I thought he might be a 2+2er!

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

"After tonight though I have him pretty well pegged. He raised A3 off UTG I 3bet JJ from the SB. When he turned a 2nd 3 I realized he was really LAG so I asked him if that was a standard play for him and his response was "no, but against you it is" I then proceeded to pound on him for the next 45 minutes until he had lost 20BB and left the table."

This is terrible. You should not be asking a fish if making an awful play is standard for him.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I play with him a lot and have him as winning player and do not doubt he is. Although I am sure it is volatile, his style is very effective when he bets/raises very thin against passive fish who call him down w/ absolutely nothing time and time again. Plus, he seems to practice real good table game selection, because I always see him in my games and I practice good table game selection.

p.s.- Raising A3o UTG is standard play for him

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

It's funny, I've only got about 200 hands on him, but in that time he's not that out of line: 32/16/1.5. Only thing that seems wacky is WTSD at 50%.
He has opened in MP with A3o and reraised in MP with A7o...

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I have him at 38/25. His postflop aggression factors are not particularly high because he will check/call down if he is faced by strength; he is not a maniac, mostly just preflop lag.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

From what i've played with him, he's definitley ultra (and overly) aggressive. Bets/raises just about any type of draw in multiway pots. One of those players that can't take a freecard and will take the liberty of charging himself as first to act with a draw.

Haupt_234

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

This guy is horrible and predictable. He overplays draws and overplays top pair.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

is this 10/20? considering i've never seen him, i'm guessing it is.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
is this 10/20? considering i've never seen him, i'm guessing it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've only seen him at 5/10.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
I've only seen him at 5/10.

[/ QUOTE ]

same

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

id say its about time for doom to show up here, insult all the posters, and challenge someone to a heads up match.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Worst bump ever!

Naming players in hands is fine, but having threads like this where players are simply being called out for playing poorly is REALLY stupid. I hope Robk deletes this thread or at the very least locks it.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
Naming players in hands is fine, but having threads like this where players are simply being called out for playing poorly is REALLY stupid. I hope Robk deletes this thread or at the very least locks it

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont think that theres anything wrong with this thread. why shouldnt people be allowed to discuss specific opponents?

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I wouldn't be surprised at all if DrDizzOOM read 2+2. Make all the jokes you guys want, but he is a thinking player. He certainly doesn't think well, but he is trying to win money and those types of guys often read things on the net like 2+2.

I just think it's really bad for the preservation of the game to post things like this. I think it's pretty much agreed around here that posting lists of "the worst players at X/Y/ limit" is a bad idea; this is the same thing imo.

Last week a whole bunch of you guys freaked out over the rake increase at Party, many of you cited the fish going broke faster as one of your main concerns. Posting names of bad players and documenting all the ways in which they're bad is not going to keep the fish around any longer.

I don't think there's anything wrong with "discussing specific opponents" in certain manners (posting hands, for instance). This, however, isn't a discussion. So far this thread has just consisted of people posting their PT stats on him, saying there's "no way he reads 2+2" and talking about how much they've won/lost to him. If this "discussion" is of value to some people then the thread belongs here, I suppose. I just don't see who's benefitting from this thread.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[censored] Y'all BitcheS Y'aLL can't hang with the DizzOcter! I would [censored] any of you punk bitches up.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

It takes up space and adds no content what so ever.

He was asking for a random guy on partypoker he had played with to PM him if he reads this board, I´d hate to see that getting standard. Going through like 9 pages of new stuff every day on this board is enough for me atleast.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

GOT IT!
Odds that he pussies out?

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

deleted by rob

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Hey Evan,

I am inclined to agree. after all, this guy didn't think his date read OOT. HAHAHAHAHAHHA

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[censored] you bitch! I'm gonna [censored] your bitch ass up! Just [censored] tell me when and where!!!!

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

one star. and trust me, I know all about shitty gimmick accounts.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

[ QUOTE ]
DrDizzOOM

[/ QUOTE ]
I banned you cause you're not funny.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Hm I have 500 hands on him at the 3/6 6max tables. He lost 300~ however his stats are 25/15/2. I guess this guy has some clue at least.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

I dont think DrDizzOOM is a 2+2er.. I have more than 8k hands with him (5/10) and he appears as a very small winner (150$ or so). His stats on the other hand are 38/24 with lots of overaggresive plays. He is a regular that is not good player so i would not do anything to discourage him...

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

You 2+2ers are clowns. I know DrDizzOOm personally and he happens to be one of the most creative short handed players around. Just because he plays a lot of hands preflop doesn't mean he can't play.

Contrary to popular 2+2 philosophy, weak-tight play is not optimal. Loose-Agg is usually the way to go on Party, ask any good shorthanded player.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Agree with beyonder.

How many of these PokerTracker gurus would call Phil Ivey a fish after looking at his numbers?

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

"Contrary to popular 2+2 philosophy, weak-tight play is not optimal"

omg you just blew my mind.

Re: DrDizzOOM
 

Funny this topic got so much attention. LAG's can definately be winners. Calling 2+2ers weak-tight as a general statement is retarded. I crush Drdizz however & I don't think hes a serious winner over any large amount mainly because he has poor table selection. His type of play would be suited to super weak-tights IMO.. however the amount of 2+2ers hes playing suggests hes not too bright.