![]() |
2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
I've been saying ever since I got to the Rio that I thought the pros would do very well this year. They're still better and I think they have adjusted to all the craziness of the new poker world. Plus a lot more dead money this year.
Well a Cunningham-Fischman-Ulliott final 3 may be porrof positive of that. And how good is Scott Fischmann anyway-- 1st out of 831 last year, and 2nd out of 2035 this?? Wow. That's as good or better than what action Dan did in the ME in 2003-04. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
He's not AS good as those numbers present...
I think he's pretty damn good though. I'd stake him, that's for sure. And I'm certainly not betting against him to win another bracelet this year. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
And I'm certainly not betting against him to win another bracelet this year. [/ QUOTE ] If the rest of the fields are anything like the first ones I'd be happy to bet against him or anyone else. Daniel N already mentioned in his blog that he thought if anyone made mosre than 3 final tables this year it might be the greatest accomplishment in poker history. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
People who don't play in tournaments view of how pros see tournaments:
Lots of dead money, watch out for "land mines" Pros in tournaments view of tournaments: I'm not going to make dominated mistakes like amateurs will. However, my EV of profit in these smaller buy-in events is equal to the buyin at most. The difference in skill between pros and good amateurs is not that huge. I have seen several well known pros cold calling and 3 betting with KQ against short stacks all in's several times. WHAT ARE YOU BEATING????? POCKET PAIR? NO. ACE-RAG? NO. STOP KQ MADNESS NOW. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
The difference in skill between pros and good amateurs is not that huge. I have seen several well known pros cold calling and 3 betting with KQ against short stacks all in's several times. WHAT ARE YOU BEATING????? POCKET PAIR? NO. ACE-RAG? NO. STOP KQ MADNESS NOW. [/ QUOTE ] I thought this was really funny for some reason. That is all. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
lol, ditto. "I treat KQ like 2-3, like its the plague in no limit hold em" -Cloutier
[ QUOTE ] STOP KQ MADNESS NOW. [/ QUOTE ] |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
And how good is Scott Fischmann anyway-- 1st out of 831 last year, and 2nd out of 2035 this?? Wow. That's as good or better than what action Dan did in the ME in 2003-04. [/ QUOTE ] I've had friends who are very good players do things online like finish 2nd twice in a row in a 2400 person tourney (Sunday Stars tourney) and win a 400 person tourney 3 times in a row (Paradise Sunday tourney, this same guy came in 2nd in a WPT). Fischman's results aren't out of line with the results any excellent player might be able to post. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
Online and Live play are very different.
|
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
Online and Live play are very different. [/ QUOTE ] Explain. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
When you are anxious about a hand online, only your mouse knows.
|
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Online and Live play are very different. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Explain. [/ QUOTE ] He can't, he's talking nonsense, he has 3 options a) i- Pick up his spade from the shallow hole he already dug and ii- run away. b) Dig deeper and hope no one notices. c) Hit you with the spade and skip to option a) ii- Regards Mack |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
<shrug> that guy with the fossils who won last year wasn't exactly an amateur. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Online and Live play are very different. [/ QUOTE ] Explain. [/ QUOTE ] Hard to take a dump while playing live - not impossible, but certainly more difficult. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
Hard to take a dump while playing live - not impossible, but certainly more difficult.
Huh??? Unless the head's like completely on the other side of the casino, you miss half as many hands. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
um...wirelessly internet connected laptop? you don't miss any hands online
|
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
Hard to take a dump while playing live - not impossible, but certainly more difficult. Huh??? Unless the head's like completely on the other side of the casino, you miss half as many hands. [/ QUOTE ] Jesus, do I have to explain everything? Obviously, I was speaking of taking a dump while at the table. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
Yeah, duh. I've just never had a good experience with wireless internet with poker, and finally gave up and hardwired my system.
|
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
compairing what the douche has done to dan... is a huge slap in the face to dan.. dan makes 2 final talbes back to back in the main event and you compair this to scott???
doesn't dan have a ME win under his belt also.... nowhere near the same. |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
[ QUOTE ]
When you are anxious about a hand online, only your mouse knows. [/ QUOTE ] that goes both ways...you can't see physical tells on the other guy either.. but still...I think it's A LOT harder to bluff live than online..... |
Re: 2005 WSOP-- Revenge of the Pros??
The 6 max event is no exception, of the remaining 14 at this time, I don't know 3 of them, the rest is a brutal group of well regarded 'name' players you absolutely do not want at your table.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.