Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=215071)

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 02:22 PM

Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I'll open with a well know semi-easy one:

You know that a woman has exactly 2 children. You ask her if she has at least one girl, and she says yes. What's the probability that she has two girls?

Answer in white:

<font color="white"> 1/3 </font>

Now, suppose that 1% of all girls are named Sarah, and that if a mother had two girls that the mother would not name both of them Sarah

You know a woman has exactly 2 children, you ask her if she has a girl named Sarah, she says yes.

What are the chances she has two girls?

partygirluk 03-17-2005 02:39 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I'm getting just under 1/5 but I could well be out.

Asufiji2004 03-17-2005 02:41 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
For a 140+ IQ you don't seem too confident.

partygirluk 03-17-2005 02:41 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I am wrong.

__Q__ 03-17-2005 02:42 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
i'd say, 1/3

Patrick del Poker Grande 03-17-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I say 1/3 for both, assuming an equal distribution of boys and girls (that a woman is equally likely to have a boy as a girl, not 60/40 or 55/45 or whatever it is in reality).

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
For a 140+ IQ you don't seem too confident.

[/ QUOTE ]

Should a person with 140+ IQ necessarily be confident?

daryn 03-17-2005 02:44 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
For a 140+ IQ you don't seem too confident.

[/ QUOTE ]

Should a person with 140+ IQ necessarily be confident?

[/ QUOTE ]

no

partygirluk 03-17-2005 02:45 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
Now I'm getting 199/399, but still not sure. Give me 5 mins.

Asufiji2004 03-17-2005 02:48 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For a 140+ IQ you don't seem too confident.

[/ QUOTE ]

Should a person with 140+ IQ necessarily be confident?

[/ QUOTE ]

in his ability to figure out this xtra hard brain teaser?....yes!!

partygirluk 03-17-2005 02:50 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
The intuitive answer is 1/3 btw, I just need to make sure my maths coincides with it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 02:51 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
without thinking- 1/3
with some crazy miracle thinking- 31%

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 02:52 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For a 140+ IQ you don't seem too confident.

[/ QUOTE ]

Should a person with 140+ IQ necessarily be confident?

[/ QUOTE ]

in his ability to figure out this xtra hard brain teaser?....yes!!

[/ QUOTE ]

this is not an xtra hard brain teaser, this is a

Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser

partygirluk 03-17-2005 02:53 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
Still getting 199/399 but my logic gut is not confident [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 02:56 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
without thinking- 1/3
with some crazy miracle thinking- 31%

[/ QUOTE ]
ok my last crazy miracle thinking guess is 50%
i want credit if any of those are correct [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] actually if 1/3 isnt correct, i think 50% is
[img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 02:57 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
screw it, im going with %50

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 03:05 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
theres 50 girls in the GG pile and 50 girls in the BG/GB pile
shes got at least one of those girls.
50-50! no?

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
in case anyone is waiting for an answer, i don't know, i'm trying to work it out now, this is similar to something my friend asked me a while ago, and i think i figured out the answer to his question, but haven't yet got one for this one

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 03:12 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
in case anyone is waiting for an answer, i don't know, i'm trying to work it out now, this is similar to something my friend asked me a while ago, and i think i figured out the answer to his question, but haven't yet got one for this one

[/ QUOTE ]
you bastard. youre not allowed to ask brain teasers and not mention you dont know the answer already.MFer!! [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
that being said, nodody knows yet if im an idiot or not with my 50% answer!!

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:13 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
Now I'm getting 199/399, but still not sure. Give me 5 mins.

[/ QUOTE ]

yah i'm pretty sure this is right

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:14 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
in case anyone is waiting for an answer, i don't know, i'm trying to work it out now, this is similar to something my friend asked me a while ago, and i think i figured out the answer to his question, but haven't yet got one for this one

[/ QUOTE ]
you bastard. youre not allowed to ask brain teasers and not mention you dont know the answer already.MFer!! [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
that being said, nodody knows yet if im an idiot or not with my 50% answer!!

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] in my defense I thought I knew the answer, but this is slightly different to another problem I solved, and then I did feel a little bit bad for people guessing when I realized i didn't know the answer, and then i thought it was a little funny

__Q__ 03-17-2005 03:15 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I really don't see how the second question is any different then the first. It doesn't seem to matter that the girls name is sarah. I think that info is just provided to confuse you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if there are two kids and your using a 50/50 breakdown between girls and boys, then the 4 possiblities are BB BG GB and GG. We know she has a girl, so there are three remaining possibilities. BG GB and GG. All three of which are equally possible. Therefore 1/3 of the time its GG.

Patrick del Poker Grande 03-17-2005 03:16 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
I really don't see how the second question is any different then the first. It doesn't seem to matter that the girls name is sarah. I think that info is just provided to confuse you.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if there are two kids and your using a 50/50 breakdown between girls and boys, then the 4 possiblities are BB BG GB and GG. We know she has a girl, so there are three remaining possibilities. BG GB and GG. All three of which are equally possible. Therefore 1/3 of the time its GG.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is exactly what I'm saying, but that could all just be an effect of my post-Chipotle haze.

Huskiez 03-17-2005 03:18 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
I got 199/399 too.

P(G, B) = P(B, G) = 1/4.
Probability of G being named Sarah is 1%.
So given she has two children, 1/100 * 2/4 = 2/400 she has exactly one girl named Sarah.

P(G, G) = 1/4.
First girl named Sarah happens 1/100 times.
If the first girl isn't named Sarah, then the next one will be named Sarah 1/100 times. Probability of this is 99/100 * 1/100.

Probability of her having two girls, one of which is named Sarah is 1/4 * (1/100 + 99/100 * 1/100) = 199/40000.

So probability of her having two girls, given she has one named Sarah, is:

199/40000 / (199/40000 + 2/400) = 199/399.

Either I am missing something or that wasn't a super duper extra hard brainteaser. Just a simple math problem.

__Q__ 03-17-2005 03:19 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
This is exactly what I'm saying, but that could all be just an effect of my post-Chipotle haze.


[/ QUOTE ]

Well I just finished off some Taco Bell, so what do I know.

partygirluk 03-17-2005 03:19 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
We know she has a girl, so there are three remaining possibilities. BG GB and GG. All three of which are equally possible. Therefore 1/3 of the time its GG.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you think the italicised bit is true given that you know she has a Sarah?

Sporky 03-17-2005 03:19 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
i'm re-submitting my answer after deleting it.

there are 3 piles of options.
B = boy
G = girl

BB GG GB

i dont' think that the 1% has anything to do with the problem. once you know that you have a girl, regardless of name...you end up with the two groups: GG (1/3rd chance) and GB (2/3rd chance). the BG group has twice as many people as the GG group, there are the same number of girls in each. which would mean 1/2 chance there is two girls with one named sarah and 1/2 chance there is 1 girl and she is named sarah.

totally wrong?

mostsmooth 03-17-2005 03:20 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now I'm getting 199/399, but still not sure. Give me 5 mins.

[/ QUOTE ]

yah i'm pretty sure this is right

[/ QUOTE ]
whats wrong with 50%?

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:20 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
what your saying seems to make sense, and it'd be weird if it wasn't 1/3, but the way i see it before talking to the woman this is true:

boy/sarah with probability 1/200
non-sarah girl/sarah with probability 199/40000

and various other combinations without sarah in it

so after you find out she has a girl named sarah, you know it's one of these two possibilities, and hence you get the 199/399 number

partygirluk 03-17-2005 03:20 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
there are 3 piles of options.
B = boy
G = girl

BB GG GB

i dont' think that the 1% has anything to do with the problem. once you know that you have a girl, regardless of name...you end up with the two groups: GG (1/3rd chance) and GB (2/3rd chance). since you are twice as likely to find a girl named sarah in the GG group, wouldn't it be twice as likely that if you find sarah, you have two girls? that bumps the GG group to be even with the BG group. which would mean 1/2 chance there is two girls with one named sarah and 1/2 chance there is 1 girl and she is named sarah.

totally wrong?

[/ QUOTE ]

Almost right.

Patrick del Poker Grande 03-17-2005 03:20 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
I got 199/399 too.

P(G, B) = P(B, G) = 1/4.
Probability of G being named Sarah is 1%.
So given she has two children, 1/100 * 2/4 = 2/400 she has exactly one girl named Sarah.

P(G, G) = 1/4.
First girl named Sarah happens 1/100 times.
If the first girl isn't named Sarah, then the next one will be named Sarah 1/100 times. Probability of this is 99/100 * 1/100.

Probability of her having two girls, one of which is named Sarah is 1/4 * (1/100 + 99/100 * 1/100) = 199/40000.

So probability of her having two girls, given she has one named Sarah, is:

199/40000 / (199/40000 + 2/400) = 199/399.

Either I am missing something or that wasn't a super duper extra hard brainteaser. Just a simple math problem.

[/ QUOTE ]
This was my answer 1b, but I think I'm gonna stick with my 1a, which is that the Sarah crap is all a line of bull and the answer is 1/3. In my view, this is somewhat similar to the Let's Make A Deal puzzle we just talked about but with the random door picking in the second round.

In the end, I think all these other calculations would be necessary if the answer to whether or not she had a child named Sarah was no. Then you have to worry about whether or not she has a girl but her name just isn't Sarah. Once the answer to this question is yes, it's essentially the same as the first puzzle - she just told you she has a girl and that's all you need to know.

__Q__ 03-17-2005 03:21 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
It doesn't matter that the girls named sarah.

Besides, you know her name is sara. The probabitly of this woman haveing a girl named sara is 100%

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:29 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
i think it's got something to do with the fact that had she had a girl but not one named sarah this situation would not take place

maybe, i dunno, just throwin something out there

Slow Play Ray 03-17-2005 03:31 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
It's 1/3 right? It's the same as the first problem, who cares what the 1st girl's name is?

partygirluk 03-17-2005 03:32 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
Chew on this.

Easy problem 1:

What is probability that a mother of 2 has a girl? (Answer in white below)

<font color="white"> 3/4 </font>

Super duper hard problem:

99 per cent of girls like Barbie. You ask a mother of two whether she has a daughter who likes barbie and she says no. What is the probability that she has a daughter? Still 3/4?

__Q__ 03-17-2005 03:37 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
Wait a second, Are we sure that the answer to the first question is 1/3.

We know that one kid is a girl. the other kid is 50/50, Boy or girl. So 1/2 GB and 1/2 GG.

Both answers are 1/2

jimdmcevoy 03-17-2005 03:39 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
nah, I'm 95% sure it's 199/399

and 99% original brain teaser is 1/3

Patrick del Poker Grande 03-17-2005 03:40 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
Wait a second, Are we sure that the answer to the first question is 1/3.

We know that one kid is a girl. the other kid is 50/50, Boy or girl. So 1/2 GB and 1/2 GG.

Both answers are 1/2

[/ QUOTE ]
We're sure. There are four equally possible combinations of children:

BB BG GB GG

By her answering that she does have a girl, that eliminates the first possibility and leaves three remaining. We're now down to three equally possible combinations, of which GG is one:

BG GB and GG

There is a 1/3 chance that the answer is GG.

Patrick del Poker Grande 03-17-2005 03:46 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
Note that if her answer were "yes, my second child is a girl" or "yes, my first child is a girl" then it would be 50/50 that both her children are girls.

DMBFan23 03-17-2005 03:47 PM

Re: Super Duper Extra Hard Brainteaser
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'll open with a well know semi-easy one:

You know that a woman has exactly 2 children. You ask her if she has at least one girl, and she says yes. What's the probability that she has two girls?

Answer in white:

<font color="white"> 1/3 </font>

Now, suppose that 1% of all girls are named Sarah, and that if a mother had two girls that the mother would not name both of them Sarah

You know a woman has exactly 2 children, you ask her if she has a girl named Sarah, she says yes.

What are the chances she has two girls?

[/ QUOTE ]

the answer isn't 1/3. we're drawing from 99% of the sample of girls, but 100% of the sample of boys. knowing that the second girl is NOT a sarah means that 1% of girls are unavailable for us to grab.

so say we have 99 girls and 100 boys, and we want to know the probability, given that one is a girl named sarah, that the other is a girl.

overall we can have

G, B
B, G
G, G

given that we have at least one girl. there are 100 ways to choose the boy in case 1, 100 ways to choose the boy in case 2, and 99 ways to choose the girl in case 3. so, I get 99/300.

initially it looks like conditional probability reduces this problem to the first one, but the "sarah stipulation" controls the sampling of the SECOND girl, not the sarah that we know to exist.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.