Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Texas Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   NL is boring? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=370215)

11-02-2005 04:52 AM

NL is boring?
 
I play 3/6 and 5/10 LHE, and I recently bought and read Harrington....so all ready to destroy the game I logged on. I thought I would start low and played some 50 and 100 buy in holdem....and I found it boring. This was completely unexpected to me..... Im wondering if this was function of the small pots and bets, or do some people truly find nl more dull then limit? By the end my VPIP must have been getting near 40% from boredom.

edge 11-02-2005 05:34 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
Yeah, no-limit pretty much blows [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I find limit boring personally, so I play no-limit. If you find no-limit boring, play limit. It's pretty simple.

Aceshigh7 11-02-2005 05:58 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
There is nothing more boring than limit.

If you find No Limit boring, you're playing at tables with too small a buy-in. Find a table with larger blinds.

Armand_Tamzarian 11-02-2005 08:00 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
Play 6max NL

Bosox 11-02-2005 08:31 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
I don't even see a comparison. There's nothing quite so boring as playing multitable limit like a machine. Just one table of 6max nl adds more complexity and interest than 4 tables of limit.

smb394 11-02-2005 09:00 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you find no-limit boring, play limit. It's pretty simple.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly.

I'm personally bored by no-limit. It just seems that you have to "create" more of the action in the game.

I like how in limit there is forced action due to the blind structures (of similarly staked games) and we're often faced with many marginal +EV situations.

To each their own though.

Ricardido 11-02-2005 09:16 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
I find NL really interesting- theres no excitement like trapping someone for their whole stack rather than a few bets like in limit.
Dont get me wrong multitabling limit is probably where the moneys at but NL keeps me guessing and is more action based- you can pull off some ridiculous bluffs. =]

boondockst 11-02-2005 10:12 AM

Re: NL is boring?
 
No matter the stake, there's nothing more fun than having your top set/PF AA/nut straight check-raised in NL...In limit, even against the dullest player, you'll only get a few bets.

gomberg 11-02-2005 01:59 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Dont get me wrong multitabling limit is probably where the moneys at but NL keeps me guessing and is more action based

[/ QUOTE ]

You're wrong with this, you can make a ton of money playing NL nowadays.

jba 11-02-2005 02:32 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
No matter the stake, there's nothing more fun than having your top set/PF AA/nut straight check-raised in NL...In limit, even against the dullest player, you'll only get a few bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but in no limit the wpt douchebag that c/r you takes 37 mins per decision, meanwhile you are sitting there scratching your butt. In limit there is a flurry of chips being thrown in the pot, much faster and more fun.

nothing worse than folding for two hours in a row and watching every hand take seven minutes.

deacsoft 11-02-2005 02:49 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
If it's boring it means you're playing it better than most people.

Perseus 11-02-2005 05:11 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
I like playing limit a lot more.

It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like:

fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call.

In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO.

ThaHero 11-02-2005 05:25 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
I find negative variance boring.

Hello NL.

11-02-2005 05:59 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
What about Pot Limit?

tdarko 11-02-2005 06:17 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
It feels like I can play a lot more hands profitably in limit, but no limit goes more like:

fold fold fold fold limp/fold fold fold fold limp/call/fold fold fold fold fold fold fold raise/win blinds fold fold fold raise/reraise/all in/call.

In limit there is more blind stealing/defending...more fun IMO.



[/ QUOTE ]
huh?

Popinjay 11-02-2005 06:48 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No matter the stake, there's nothing more fun than having your top set/PF AA/nut straight check-raised in NL...In limit, even against the dullest player, you'll only get a few bets.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but in no limit the wpt douchebag that c/r you takes 37 mins per decision, meanwhile you are sitting there scratching your butt. In limit there is a flurry of chips being thrown in the pot, much faster and more fun.

nothing worse than folding for two hours in a row and watching every hand take seven minutes.

[/ QUOTE ]

In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is virtually impossible at limit.

jba 11-02-2005 06:49 PM

Re: NL is boring?
 
[ QUOTE ]
In NL you can play every hand and be profitable. That is nearly impossible at limit.

[/ QUOTE ]

basically, you missed the whole point.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.