![]() |
percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
Does anyone have an idea (and not just a guess) of which percentage of players has PT and PokerEdge running at the various limits? Any at .5/1? All at 30/60? Etc.
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
What is PokerEdge
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
15%
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
More info on PokerEdge at http://www.poker-edge.com/ (imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too)
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
At what limits is that 15%?
There has to be ahuge difference between .5/1 and 30/60. |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
More info on PokerEdge at http://www.poker-edge.com/ (imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too) [/ QUOTE ] or you could just datamine for free |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
seriously. PokerEdge is a waste of money. Datamining + PV makes a lot more sense.
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
Was at a 0.5/1 NL table at Party last year 10 Max. Some idiot started quoting stats at the table. 4 people at the table (3 + me) were using poker tracker.
Needless to say, the others tightened up considerably. Riduculously small sample size but 40% at that table. |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
Seriously..someone doing the datamining for me, and me not having to keep track of that is worth 20$ a month to me.
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
(imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too) [/ QUOTE ] imo when you register and suggest a commercial product with your first post, you are shilling and should buy an ad |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
That's my impression too.
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
seriously. PokerEdge is a waste of money. Datamining + PV makes a lot more sense. [/ QUOTE ] Explain, I say this as a PokerEdge fan [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I use PokerEdge only for table selection. When playing PV is obviously much better. I have read that some people datamine for 30minutes before sitting at a table! Damn, this is more expensive than the $10,- /month PE fee. |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
What is "PV?"
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
Didn't mean to promote any product, just had no idea there was any alternative. Never heard of datamining and playerview before.
So if I understand correctly the following is considered to be wise: - using PT+PE for table selection (if you consider PE to be a waste use you're own collected data instead) - use PV for playing (initially makes use of the PE database, later also/only of the hands you're playing at that moment) One question remains: is it still useful to datamine on a table you're not playing or intending to when you have PE or does PE provide you with that data anyway in the following hours (put otherwise: do they watch ALL tables above .5/1?) Thanks for your patience with me. |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
(put otherwise: do they watch ALL tables above .5/1?) [/ QUOTE ] If you have PE, you don't have to datamine before moving up. You can use a database up to 3/6 (for the small stakes fee) |
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
I think Poker Edge is the most usefull for table selection, (Game selection, Discipline, and Talent, with talent being the least important requierment for sucsess). It also gives you instant info on players you have never played with before. Pokertracker I use mainly for looking at my own game. As for how many people use all these programs I think 15% might be about right. Don't think it is any higher than that since only the people who are playing a large amount of hands are using these items.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.