Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Tigerite (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=402315)

good2cu 12-20-2005 08:33 PM

Tigerite
 
That call with A9s was terrible, of course im going to be stupid tight with the uber shorty. Best you could hope for was a flip. Way to flush both our equaitity down the drain. I hate you [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Sabrazack 12-20-2005 08:35 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
You are not licensed to make crap posts are you?
I thought only skipperbob had that license? [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

jeffraider 12-20-2005 08:36 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
Post the hand if you're going to call him out like this.

good2cu 12-20-2005 08:36 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
Well you were miss informed. Only super sexy gentlemen have the right to make crap posts.

skipperbob 12-20-2005 08:38 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well you were miss informed. Only super sexy gentlemen have the right to make crap posts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do You See Why?

Sabrazack 12-20-2005 08:39 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well you were miss informed. Only super sexy gentlemen have the right to make crap posts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do You See Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

This made me laught alot. Pwned by the gay sailorboy you are.

tigerite 12-20-2005 09:40 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
That call with A9s was terrible, of course im going to be stupid tight with the uber shorty. Best you could hope for was a flip. Way to flush both our equaitity down the drain. I hate you [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't worry, I've had my arse kicked tonight at the $109s anyway, people making FAR worse calls than that one. Anyway this was the hand he was on about.

PartyPoker - NL Texas Hold'em $100 Buy-in + $9 Entry Fee Tournament | Level: 5 - 4 players (Converter: PGC)


Chip Counts:
Button: 760 Chips
<font color="red">Hero: 4810 Chips</font>
BB: 3340 Chips
UTG: 1090 Chips

Hero is SB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Blinds are 75/150

PreFlop
UTG is All-In, <font color="blue">Button folds</font>
Hero is All-In, <font color="blue">BB folds</font>

(2 players) FLOP: 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 6050 Chips )


(2 players) TURN: Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 6050 Chips )


(2 players) RIVER: Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ( Pot Size: 6050 Chips )


Final Pot:6050 Chips

tigerite 12-20-2005 09:42 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
I'm not quite sure how you know I'm tigerite mind. Anyway - your range has to be 17% there. It's a no brainer call if you ask me.

12-20-2005 09:43 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
"Uber-shorty" has 2 BB less than you.... NC Tigerite. OP: stop whining. Don't push into the huge stack if you don't want to get called.

tigerite 12-20-2005 09:48 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

downtown 12-20-2005 09:55 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
Way to flush both your equitity to me. I love you both.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I was shorty. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

durron597 12-20-2005 09:57 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
This is a very easy call by tigerite.

tigerite 12-20-2005 09:58 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
You were. You busted 3rd I think? I only got 2nd though.

downtown 12-20-2005 10:02 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
Good table selection, me. [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

Edit: Oops, didn't see that the hand was already posted.

downtown 12-20-2005 10:07 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not quite sure how you know I'm tigerite mind.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you posted your s/n here once. That's how I knew it, I had it in my note file.

Snarf 12-20-2005 11:01 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Incredibly easy call....He pushed with 44 and was pissed enough to post it on 2+2?

Clearly you pwyned him.

p.s. My first usage of that word. How'd I do? I spelled it wrong ...didn't I?...

runner4life7 12-20-2005 11:23 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
wow good2cu lost any potential credibility

jeffraider 12-20-2005 11:25 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
Hahaha knew it! tigerite always wins.

runner4life7 12-20-2005 11:26 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
pwned

durron597 12-20-2005 11:33 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
wow good2cu lost any potential credibility

[/ QUOTE ]

first round of sttfhuc2

12-20-2005 11:38 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
Did you tell him to "ship it, holla" after?

Melchiades 12-20-2005 11:49 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
Did you tell him to "ship it, holla" after?

[/ QUOTE ]

z32fanatic 12-20-2005 11:54 PM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not quite sure how you know I'm tigerite mind. Anyway - your range has to be 17% there. It's a no brainer call if you ask me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would put his range here at 22+, A2+, KQ. This puts it at about a +.4% $EV right? I just bought SNGPT so I'm still learning some of this. Is .4% $EV an "easy call"? I would appreciate any insight into what makes this an easy call.

Scuba Chuck 12-21-2005 12:10 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
I get some kind of personal satisfaction by making plays like this for some reason. Teach that guy a lesson.

ilya 12-21-2005 01:08 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
This call seems ok, but I don't understand why some people think it's incredibly easy. It's hard to imagine it being more than +0.3-0.4 or so.

p.s. nice river

Melchiades 12-21-2005 01:14 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
I think the reason people are treating it like its an easy call is because of the OP. They wanna rub it in. If you are going to call out someone over a "terrible" call, you might want to be sure that it's at least -EV.

ilya 12-21-2005 02:10 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think the reason people are treating it like its an easy call is because of the OP. They wanna rub it in. If you are going to call out someone over a "terrible" call, you might want to be sure that it's at least -EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good point.

good2cu 12-21-2005 03:06 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
haha. I wasn't complaining, i only posted becasue of the resulting chat that revaled we were all 2+2. I think it was a rather marginal push and a rather marginal call, thaere was no hostitly involed. BTW, the SNGPT results doesn't factor in that the BB will be overcalling with some hands.

Shillx 12-21-2005 03:37 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
It isn't an easy call. In fact, it isn't a call at all IMO. Pushing into 2 huge stacks and one shorter stack presents just about the worse of all possible pushing conditions. I would not be suprised if the correct push % here is something like 12%. A9s would be a fold against that kind of range. 44 is pretty close on the pushing side and I would probably do it at game speed (though it looks to be slightly wrong).

tigerite 12-21-2005 06:01 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]

I think you posted your s/n here once. That's how I knew it, I had it in my note file.

[/ QUOTE ]

I definitely didn't do that..

curtains 12-21-2005 07:04 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
btw pushing with 44 is -EV. If anyone made a mistake its the cutoff. The cutoff incorrectly pushed, however the BB made a correct call if the cutoffs range included 44 (which it did).

fluorescenthippo 12-21-2005 07:20 AM

Re: Tigerite
 
[ QUOTE ]
By the way he pushed with 44, which needs ranges of 7%/9%/9% to be +$EV.. I would have folded in his position. But whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

how did you figure this out? and are you using the "equity modeling" in sngpt in the calc?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.