New Drug Poll
 

Which of the following drugs should be decriminalized, and available for public use, be it recreational or not? (It is assumed that, if legalized, the drug will be regulated in a competant fashion)

Re: New Drug Poll
 

two drug posts in two days... so what have you been up to recently?

Re: New Drug Poll
 

I only chose alcohol because I drink it everyday.

Re: New Drug Poll
 

It's been a while actually. Careful with the assumptions [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: New Drug Poll
 

Everything on that list should be legal. But clearly we should ban bread.

Ban bread

Re: New Drug Poll
 

that's even more clever then the dihydrogen monoxide one - I like it -

RB

Re: New Drug Poll
 

How many decriminalization threads do we really need? The majority of the politics posters seems pretty much in consensus that drugs should be decriminalized.

Re: New Drug Poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
I only chose alcohol because I drink it everyday.

[/ QUOTE ]

i picked alcohol based on just because it tastes better then everything else on this list. It barely beat out LSD [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: New Drug Poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
i picked alcohol based on just because it tastes better then everything else on this list

[/ QUOTE ]

In that case, my vote would go for opium [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: New Drug Poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
Everything on that list should be legal. But clearly we should ban bread.

Ban bread

[/ QUOTE ]

That's great.
Oh i voted it all should be legal.

Re: New Drug Poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
How many decriminalization threads do we really need? The majority of the politics posters seems pretty much in consensus that drugs should be decriminalized.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently not. Only 6% of the respondents gave the right answer.

natedogg

ESP?
 

Just wondering how you knew that six percent did not select any of the check boxes?

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: New Drug Poll
 

So let's say they were all to be made legal.

How would you regulate the distribution of more addictive/dangerous drugs, like meth and heroin?

Re: ESP?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Just wondering how you knew that six percent did not select any of the check boxes?

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Please tell me you're joking.

natedogg

Re: New Drug Poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
So let's say they were all to be made legal.

How would you regulate the distribution of more addictive/dangerous drugs, like meth and heroin?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ideally, not at all. Realistically, just like alchohol.

natedogg

Re: ESP?
 

Needling is more accurate than joking. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: New Drug Poll
 

My post copied from the other poll thread:

I said in a recent post in another thread that I have only smoked pot a couple times many years ago and didn't particularly like it. Nor do I drink often. Having said that, and considering myself a conservative christian, I nonetheless would be willing to see marijuana, cocaine and a few other drugs legalized. Part of this is because I don't like the hypocrisy of alcohol being an accepted drug in society while others are not, when alcohol is just as detrimental to one's health and family and life as are others when taken to the extreme of alcoholism. And given that reason, I see no need to have the situation where organized crime enriches itself and perpetuates an endless cycle of violence that is associated with the drug trade.

HOWEVER, just as with alcohol, use of those legal drugs while driving and performing other actions where there is a serious risk of injuring others should be punished harshly.

So for all you pro-legalize people, in exchange for legalization, would you be willing in the same legislation for there to be a penalty of 3 years mandatory incarceration for driving while under the influence (or flying, operating machinery, etc.)? Under the influence defined by having used in the past 4 hours and just like with driving under the influence of alcohol, an officer's word as to that is good in court in absence of a blood test that was refused. 3 years. No ifs, ands or buts. And it doesn't matter if you are the governor of a state or some lowlife unemployed druggie. Would you take that deal?

Oh, and employers still don't have to hire or keep in employment those that use drugs. It's their business and if you use drugs you just can't work in certain jobs.