Steelers-Colts
 

Assuming Ben can practice all week and is back Monday night.

What do you put the Steelers' chances of winning in Indy on Monday. No points or anything, just if this game was played ten times how many would each team win.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

Colts win... End Thread

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

By default they would have to be less than 50% as they would never be favored. 20%-40% seems about right.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

Is it bad form for me to brag that I have tickets to the game?
Meh, I don't care.
I'm goin to the game! [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

the way they played last week i'd put them at less than 20% against a lot of teams. they were lucky to get within 14 against a team that couldn't move the ball to save their lives.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

I hate these overlapping poll options. What if I think the answer is 20%?

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

if ben practices all week and plays, i think they have a very good chance at beating the colts. the steelers run the ball very well and play great defense. also, they're 4-1 on the road...

i wouldn't be suprised if pittsburgh wins, but i'm hoping they dont... my bengals need all the help we can get to win that division.

WHO DEY!

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

sorry, that would fall in the 0-20% category

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

By default they would have to be less than 50% as they would never be favored. 20%-40% seems about right.

[/ QUOTE ]
underdogs cant win?

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

the way they played last week i'd put them at less than 20% against a lot of teams. they were lucky to get within 14 against a team that couldn't move the ball to save their lives.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saying something so stupid as this should eliminate you from all future discussions about football forever.

1)Lucky to be within 14? The game went to overtime so it's not like the game was a blowout and the Steelers got a couple crappy points at the end.

2)Take away the starting QB of any good/great team and see how well they would do. Would Indy have won last week without Manning? No way in hell.

3)Tommy Maddux - Do I even need to say more?

There is a reason why Ben sat the last 3 weeks. With a healthy Ben, Steelers are one of the best teams in the NFL. Steelers should have won all 3 games, but they went 2-1. I'll take 2-1 with a backup QB any season, especially when Tommy Maddux had to play in 2 of those 3 games.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There is no way that the Steelers are less than 20% against the Colts with Ben Roethlisberger ready to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

the way they played last week i'd put them at less than 20% against a lot of teams. they were lucky to get within 14 against a team that couldn't move the ball to save their lives.

[/ QUOTE ]

Saying something so stupid as this should eliminate you from all future discussions about football forever.

1)Lucky to be within 14? The game went to overtime so it's not like the game was a blowout and the Steelers got a couple crappy points at the end.

2)Take away the starting QB of any good/great team and see how well they would do. Would Indy have won last week without Manning? No way in hell.

3)Tommy Maddux - Do I even need to say more?

There is a reason why Ben sat the last 3 weeks. With a healthy Ben, Steelers are one of the best teams in the NFL. Steelers should have won all 3 games, but they went 2-1. I'll take 2-1 with a backup QB any season, especially when Tommy Maddux had to play in 2 of those 3 games.

[/ QUOTE ]

you do understand the concept of the game not being as close as the score indicated, right?

the steelers played horribly against a pretty inept baltimore team. if they play that way against the majority of the nfl they get blown out. baltimore should have blown them out, but boller had a grand total of 137 passing yards, despite 21 completions.

and it wasn't all maddox's fault. they couldn't run the ball either.

if you really think pgh deserved to get to overtime last week, i feel sorry for you.

Re: Steelers-Colts
 

[ QUOTE ]
you do understand the concept of the game not being as close as the score indicated, right?

the steelers played horribly against a pretty inept baltimore team. if they play that way against the majority of the nfl they get blown out. baltimore should have blown them out, but boller had a grand total of 137 passing yards, despite 21 completions.

and it wasn't all maddox's fault. they couldn't run the ball either.

if you really think pgh deserved to get to overtime last week, i feel sorry for you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, you're right, Pittsburgh didn't deserve to go to overtime...

God I hate stupid people who try to talk sports.