Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   The Stock Market (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum???? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=379440)

squiffy 11-16-2005 03:45 AM

World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
According to Fortune magazine interview with Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, both state very emphatically that world economy is NOT a zero sum game.

So can we please stop saying comparing the American economy or the world economy to an artificial closed system poker game with 9 players and 52 cards in a deck.

See Oct. 31, 2005 issue of Fortune at page 84. Maybe someone can find a weblink.

11-16-2005 05:34 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
maybe you should get the nobel prize in econ for figuring this out.
There are a few markets such as options where it is a zero sum game though.

crazy canuck 11-17-2005 02:05 AM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
There are a few markets such as options where it is a zero sum game though.

In theory these should return the risk free interest rate. In practice they are negative sum becasue of transaction costs.

Uglyowl 11-17-2005 02:28 AM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
[ QUOTE ]
So can we please stop saying comparing the American economy or the world economy to an artificial closed system poker game with 9 players and 52 cards in a deck.


[/ QUOTE ]

Who on earth said that? The people here are very smart and that is basic knowledge.

solucky 11-17-2005 01:20 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
in this way poker is a negative game too (rake):)

11-17-2005 01:22 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
why do you say you should earn the risk free interest rate in options markets?
it seems to me there is an equivalent loss for every gain minus transaction costs.
having participated on a small scale i know of know interest i have gained.

Sniper 11-17-2005 05:26 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
[ QUOTE ]
in this way poker is a negative game too (rake):)

[/ QUOTE ]

I have corrected this before... Poker is a zero sum game, because the house counts as part of the system.

Sniper 11-17-2005 05:27 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
[ QUOTE ]
In theory these should return the risk free interest rate. In practice they are negative sum becasue of transaction costs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Canuck, have you been drinking again??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

hedgeyerbets 11-17-2005 08:13 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
http://www.riskglossary.com/link/opt...ing_theory.htm

Risk neutral pricing.

Sniper 11-17-2005 08:27 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
What does that link have to do with zero sum.

hedgeyerbets 11-17-2005 08:36 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
It explains why options and other derivatives earn the risk free rate in theory... which you called some guy drunk for stating.

Sniper 11-17-2005 08:45 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
[ QUOTE ]
It explains why options and other derivatives earn the risk free rate in theory... which you called some guy drunk for stating.

[/ QUOTE ]

I very humbly suggest you read the article in the link, again!!!

hedgeyerbets 11-17-2005 08:59 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
the link does not do a good job of explaining the expected theoretical return of options. probably should have read it before linking it [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I'll post a reply tomorrow if I remember to bring my hull book home from work [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Too lazy to derive the answer.

hedgeyerbets 11-17-2005 09:08 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
Ah, you are correct. Must lower caffein consumption and stop misreading thing. A perfectly delta-hedged option contract has an expected return of risk free rate - an option contract does not.

crazy canuck 11-17-2005 11:19 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
Correct me if 'm wrong, but I think an option has an expected return that equals to the risk free interest rate in the Black-Scholes world, becasue everything has to be discounted. But even if it's true I have no idea if this applies in the real world.

PS: I haven't been drinking when I made the original post, but I've been drinking now. The restaurants have some good wine selection here in Montreal. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

crazy canuck 11-17-2005 11:37 PM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
Never mind. I think becasue the option is already discounted, if you are long it has an expected return equal to the interest rate, but the person on the other side of the trade loses an expected amount equal to the interest rate. So yes it is zero sum (without transaction costs).

I was also thinking of the delta neutral portfolio.

Sniper 11-18-2005 02:01 AM

Re: World Economy v. Poker??? Zero-Sum????
 
Just for the record... options are risky... don't want anyone thinking they can buy options and get a risk free return!! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

There are also option strategies that mitigate some of the risk.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.