Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   99. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=350838)

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 05:22 AM

99.
 
Villain's PT notes:

{{Icon: Slightly LP preflop, but Agg postflop.
Hands: 55
VP$IP: 25
PFR: 4
W$SD: 100
Agg-Factor: 3.3}}

He took a while before calling my flop bet.

-----
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (7 handed)

BB ($103.75)
UTG ($103.10)
MP1 ($48.50)
MP2 ($50)
CO ($30.35)
Hero ($56.25)
SB ($151.85)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. MP2 posts a blind of $0.50.
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 (poster) checks, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $2.5</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls $2.

Flop: ($5.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3.5</font>, MP2 calls $3.50.

Turn: ($12.75) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP2 checks, Hero checks.

River: ($12.75) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP2 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $8</font>
-----

j0wlev 10-05-2005 05:24 AM

Re: 99.
 
nicely played.

Benholio 10-05-2005 05:32 AM

Re: 99.
 
What hand are you trying to get to fold here, TT? JT maybe? What other hands could he be on here that fold and have you beat?

10-05-2005 05:32 AM

Re: 99.
 
I'd probably take the opportunity to check behind on the river here... hands you beat are unlikly to call you here.

10-05-2005 05:38 AM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd probably take the opportunity to check behind on the river here... hands you beat are unlikly to call you here.

[/ QUOTE ]

ditto, to make this kind of move I think you need more of a read than the 55 hands you have

either more hands or something you've seen him do to make you think he can lay down a J here.

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 05:39 AM

Re: 99.
 
Heh, I'm not betting for value, kids.

10-05-2005 05:45 AM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
either more hands or something you've seen him do to make you think he can lay down a J here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly, I'd tried this move a few times when I first started playing SSNL online, and couldn't push people off their hands. I don't both playing fancy here I just check behind, the first loss is the best loss...

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 05:54 AM

Re: 99.
 
He's not a fish. I think I've played with him a few times. The PT stats aren't hands I've played, they're hands form my miner. He's nothing special, but not awful.

10-05-2005 05:59 AM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
He's not a fish. I think I've played with him a few times. The PT stats aren't hands I've played, they're hands form my miner. He's nothing special, but not awful.

[/ QUOTE ]

If he's good enough to believe your flop bet was merely a continuation bet, and that you now MUST have hit your ace and he can lay down a jack, then good play. I just think overall this sort of play is -EV at SSNL so I seldom try it.

10-05-2005 06:08 AM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
He's not a fish. I think I've played with him a few times. The PT stats aren't hands I've played, they're hands form my miner. He's nothing special, but not awful.

[/ QUOTE ]

It seems like you are best qualified to answer your own question here, as it comes down to your read on his play.

From what I know, he doesn't seem tight enough for you to make the bet, but you know more about him than me.

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 06:12 AM

Re: 99.
 
I guess I just really hate checking behind and conceding the pot.

10-05-2005 06:32 AM

Re: 99.
 
meh, take comfort in the fact you can make thinner value bets

Malachii 10-05-2005 06:43 AM

Re: 99.
 
I basically like it. Opponent specific, of course. I'd make it $12 though.

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 12:45 PM

Re: 99.
 
Villain said, "AKo?" in the chat box, hesitated, then called with AQo. Excellent call after putting me on a hand you can't beat, lol.

KramerTM 10-05-2005 12:51 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Villain said, "AKo?" in the chat box, hesitated, then called with AQo. Excellent call after putting me on a hand you can't beat, lol.

[/ QUOTE ]

You really expect him to fold AQo here?

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 12:52 PM

Re: 99.
 
If he has me on AKo? Uh, yes.

KramerTM 10-05-2005 12:56 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
If he has me on AKo? Uh, yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

No one ever actually "has" you on an exact hand. The fact that he said AK off makes it even more rediculous. He was merely stating a hand that is within your range that might beat him. Only an idiot says "AKo?" and then actually folds here.

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 12:58 PM

Re: 99.
 
He didn't say AKo, I put that in unconciously, and tons of people call opponent's hands before folding. Whether it be to save face when you call and lose to it or to induce a showing from your opponent, I don't know.

KramerTM 10-05-2005 01:00 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know.

[/ QUOTE ]

nuSFwck 10-05-2005 01:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I just really hate checking behind and conceding the pot.

[/ QUOTE ]


i'd bet 10 or 11 and shut him out. anything less, i think, and he may want to look you up with a K or weak A.

-Skeme- 10-05-2005 01:05 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for your contribution to the thread.

jhall23 10-05-2005 02:14 PM

Re: 99.
 
I think you should bet the pot on this flop. To coordinated and less likely to get a fold with the that bet.

River is fine against someone you think can fold but I probably make it 10 instead of 8. I think 10 and 12 accomplish the same thing so you can save 2 bucks by betting 10. I really feel the 8 bet get's called more often, maybe it's a psychological thing with it being only a single digit bet.

orange 10-05-2005 05:41 PM

Re: 99.
 
I play it the same, except I bet maybe $10 on the river. Most opponents will have a J or worse and lay down.

wdeadwyler 10-05-2005 05:57 PM

Re: 99.
 
I dont like the river bet. Only j10 and jq might fold, and the rest of his jacks just made two pair. Granted he didnt bet the river, so his likelihood of two pair goes way down. The only better hands that fold this river are j10 and jq, and even then, sometimes players like to look you up when you check behind on the turn. He will fold his missed gutshots and then you dont get to see his hand and learn more about him. I dont like this, I check behind and concede the pot to a jack.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 03:44 AM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think you should bet the pot on this flop. To coordinated and less likely to get a fold with the that bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does a PSB do that my $3.50 didn't? Psychological thing?

jhall23 10-06-2005 10:18 AM

Re: 99.
 
"Protects" your "overpair/set" more. On a super draw heavy board I typically bet close to the pot on the flop when I have a hand I want to protect. Villian may view the bet as showing that you don't find your hand all that great since you aren't protecting your hand as much. Of course I vary my flop bet sizes, but in general on this type of flop I am more apt to pot it.

soah 10-06-2005 10:40 AM

Re: 99.
 
Bet the turn and expect a fold. The long hesitation is nearly always extreme weakness. If you happen to be behind, you at least have outs on the turn. On the river a bluff won't have that bonus equity, nor can you expect much of a payoff if you suckout.

I don't see much point in betting the river. The general rule of thumb is to consider a bluff if you cannot win by checking, and there is no reason to believe that you can't showdown a winner here.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 01:02 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
"Protects" your "overpair/set" more.

[/ QUOTE ]

I rarely ever pot flops, with or without a set or overpair. It'll usually kill the action a 2/3rd PSB might give me, and it's nearly always enough to give them incorrect odds.


[ QUOTE ]
Bet the turn and expect a fold. The long hesitation is nearly always extreme weakness. If you happen to be behind, you at least have outs on the turn. On the river a bluff won't have that bonus equity, nor can you expect much of a payoff if you suckout.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is good.


[ QUOTE ]
The general rule of thumb is to consider a bluff if you cannot win by checking, and there is no reason to believe that you can't showdown a winner here.

[/ QUOTE ]

What exactly am I beating here?

soah 10-06-2005 06:59 PM

Re: 99.
 
76, 54, A8, 55, etc

amoeba 10-06-2005 07:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
i've generally found the flop bet, turn check, river bet to have very very low folding equity.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 07:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
You honestly think a player with those stats plays these hands this way?

soah 10-06-2005 07:09 PM

Re: 99.
 
You don't have enough stats to draw any conclusions about his play.

But if you want to go by that, you say he is aggressive postflop. On this hand he has not taken a single aggressive action. The most logical assumption is that he is weak.

xorbie 10-06-2005 07:50 PM

Re: 99.
 
This is definitely a board I bet $5-$6 on the flop and $12 or so on the turn if he calls.

10-06-2005 08:09 PM

Re: 99.
 
I don't get why people bet the turn here, is it a value bet or a bluff? It doesn't seem to do have a good purpose.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 08:13 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why people bet the turn here, is it a value bet or a bluff? It doesn't seem to do have a good purpose.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?


[ QUOTE ]
You don't have enough stats to draw any conclusions about his play.


[/ QUOTE ]

Then how do you determine he'll check-call preflop and post with 76, 54, A8 and 55? Just guesses of what a typical SSNL player can have here?


[ QUOTE ]
But if you want to go by that, you say he is aggressive postflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, when did I say this? I'm super tired right now so my memory may be a bit hazy. I can't find me saying he's aggressive.

soah 10-06-2005 08:16 PM

Re: 99.
 
You said: "Slightly LP preflop, but Agg postflop."

I would bet the turn because I believe I need to protect my hand, and it greatly reduces the chances that I will face a tough decision on the river.

10-06-2005 08:19 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?

[/ QUOTE ]

I still don't follow. The way I see it, he calls with better hands, he folds worse hands. It's good if he has a draw, but checking behind you are only giving up about 1/5 times when the draw hits on the river.

I guess if you know he doesn't have you beat it's a good bet, but from the info I have I'd wouldn't be certain enough.

amoeba 10-06-2005 08:22 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?

[/ QUOTE ]

I still don't follow. The way I see it, he calls with better hands, he folds worse hands. It's good if he has a draw, but checking behind you are only giving up about 1/5 times when the draw hits on the river.

I guess if you know he doesn't have you beat it's a good bet, but from the info I have I'd wouldn't be certain enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just don't believe he happened to hit the K and I don't mind taking it down right there. also I want to keep my play consistent with times that I have say 56 there but want to represent the K and also keep it consistent with the times that I do have AK.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 08:58 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
You said: "Slightly LP preflop, but Agg postflop."

[/ QUOTE ]

There it is.


[ QUOTE ]
I would bet the turn because I believe I need to protect my hand, and it greatly reduces the chances that I will face a tough decision on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

That works.

beset7 10-06-2005 10:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
You honestly think a player with those stats plays these hands this way?

[/ QUOTE ]

Its 55 hands bro. I'm sure even some of my 97/35/3 buddies could play 55 hands that way if they were distracted by the NFL game or something.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.