Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   are the steps worth trying (NC) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=270557)

treeofwisdom7 06-11-2005 05:42 AM

are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
i was watching lvl 1 mini step on party .. it looks like they play looooooose..
are the steps easyer and do any twoplustwoers play them ?

imported_machine 06-11-2005 06:17 AM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
i play them occasionly usually play 20+2 stts but i would say the steps are probably a lower standard then the stts as even fish make it up the ladder sometimes, the only prob with steps is they can be a waste of time, that time you could have used making some real profit. I would say they are worth it econmically if you play them in your spare time, not time you have set aside to play cash or stt games.

Taraz 06-11-2005 06:40 AM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
I think most people agree that they are a rake trap at worst and a fish trap at best. But if you're just looking to have fun and not for profit, go for it.

DonCaspero 06-11-2005 12:25 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
rake trap or not - they are pretty soft

treeofwisdom7 06-11-2005 05:09 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
lvl 1 mini looked really soft. but when i watched lvl 2 i saw tight wads make it to BB300 7ppl..

anyway i gotta get a new email somewhere

lastchance 06-11-2005 05:33 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
Remember, Step 1 is really $10+2, not $11+1.

lehighguy 06-11-2005 06:27 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
I don't see these step tournament things in my party window. How do they work? Were are they?

MastiffPaul 06-11-2005 08:13 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
Can someone explain why they are considered a rake trap?

Voltron87 06-11-2005 08:16 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
basically because you bounce around from step to step, and each time they take rake. So when you go and get a "repeat step 2" entry or whatever, that entry gets rake taken and party doesnt actually pay any real prizes out.

MastiffPaul 06-11-2005 08:26 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
I'm afraid I still don't understand. Does this mean that, if I were to win a freeroll into a tourament one step down, there would be a hidden rake fee to use that freeroll?

Voltron87 06-11-2005 08:35 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
Ok, say step 2 is a 50+5. You enter in it. 50 goes to the prizepool, 5 goes to party. Say you finish in a place that lets you do step 2 again. You have a "freeroll" worth 55$. that 55$ is drawn from the prizepool everyone contributed to. You enter the step 2 with your freeroll, and party takes out 5$ to its coffers. Each time you bounce around party takes rake and is 5$ richer, without paying out any real $$$.


So if you enter a 50+5 step, and bounce around 3 times, party makes 15$ but doesn't pay out any money. And the way the steps are structured people bounce around a lot.

MastiffPaul 06-11-2005 09:09 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
Okay, that makes sense now. Thanks for the explanation.

But despite PP's greediness (can't say I blame them), would Steps be a good idea if you looked at them as practice? Given that there's so much bouncing around, I can afford to make more risky and experimental moves if busting out is going to lead to a freeroll anyway, right? Of course, I would have to take into account that, since the payout structure is radically different, EV+ plays would probaby be different than at the regular SNGs. So perhaps they're not such a good idea for practice; they may be a completely differernt species.

Nottom 06-11-2005 10:46 PM

Re: are the steps worth trying (NC)
 
The idea of the steps being a "rake trap" is really a bit of a misnomer. In reality if one guy started playing a step 1 ad another guy decided to just play regular SNGs until he either busted or made $1000+x and bought into a step 5 both are in essence contributing a portion of their winnings back to party as rake, all players do that unless they cash out everytime they win.

The real problem I see with the steps is that the lowest ones are a waste of time for anyone who thinks they have a reasonable shot of making any money. Even if you buy-in at lvl 3, some of your prize pool is "wasted" on freerolls to lower level steps, which are usually -timeEV for a decent player. If however you are a low limit player just looking for something fun to do, I think they are fine as long as you understand they are essentialy a trap to get lowerlevel players to feed the top level sharks (but only in the same way something like a WSOP satellite is).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.