Re: WHAT THE F*** explain this one..????????
 

[ QUOTE ]

I think this might be one of the best posts I've seen in a little while....

[/ QUOTE ]

That's b/c PM is the f*ckin' man, man. This is *exactly* the reason no0b posters need to use the search function...many of the best (and original) STT strategists don't post here much anymore....everyone is currently stuck with dumb trip reports, gay pinko-[censored] commie bashing, and everyone bowing down to that super donkey Gigabet.

The most interesting recent stuff (IMHO) has been the very minor post-flop renassaince and the SNG analyzer study (which is just an extension of preliminary discussions Eastbay and Bozeman were having anyway back in the day)...

That and the PVS becoming the new stop n go (tactic misapplied and misunderstood by like 99% of posters)...

Yugoslav

Re: WHAT THE F*** explain this one..????????
 

Hey, if we can get PM back posting, maybe William will be next.

The Shadow

Re: WHAT THE F*** explain this one..????????
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hey, if we can get PM back posting, maybe William will be next.

The Shadow

[/ QUOTE ]

William did for like 4 days a month ago or something....

But all he'd really do is have it out with citanul methinks....

So yes! We definitely need William back!

Bwahahahhahaah!

Yugoslav

Re: WHAT THE F*** explain this one..????????
 

Grab some aspirin, raptor...

Re: WHAT THE F*** explain this one..????????
 

i don't think there is anything wrong with this play. I rutinely take a little risk IE -1/4 of my stack to...

1. try and bust somebody
2. try and get my stack to cover everyone elses
3. remind everyone not to steal my blind

plus there is a lot of chips already out there.

I think most people are concerned with the hands that he ran into and the result. He pushed and THEN ran into Kings. This should have nothing to do with the play. The result never creates the right play or the wrong play, the action does.