Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
 

[ QUOTE ]
GentlemanGerry,

Weren't you the guy who was caught changing a hand history from 15/30 to 50/100. Shouldn't you be too embarassed to make these trolling posts?

[/ QUOTE ]

he should be embarassed to make these posts. but the change was a bit less drastic (he changed a 15/30 hand history to 30/60 so he could post it here).

he should also be embarassed b/c his IP is the same as our other beloved posters cinnaminwind et.al. (et.al. = i can't remember, not i know and am not telling...it was posted in general) ... the reason he should be embarassed results from the ambiguity between troll and wannabe poster.

anyways, why bump this?

Barron

Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
 

[ QUOTE ]

anyways, why bump this?
Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, that was me bumping. I din't think the data was worth a new thread, it kinda fitted here, and I thought some people might be interested.......

Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
GentlemanGerry,

Weren't you the guy who was caught changing a hand history from 15/30 to 50/100. Shouldn't you be too embarassed to make these trolling posts?

[/ QUOTE ]

he should be embarassed to make these posts. but the change was a bit less drastic (he changed a 15/30 hand history to 30/60 so he could post it here).

he should also be embarassed b/c his IP is the same as our other beloved posters cinnaminwind et.al. (et.al. = i can't remember, not i know and am not telling...it was posted in general) ... the reason he should be embarassed results from the ambiguity between troll and wannabe poster.

anyways, why bump this?

Barron

[/ QUOTE ]

WHOAH! This is the first time this has been revealed. I miss the matador.

Re: Biggest winner/s at Party Limit Holdem?
 

Too late to edit my post, but someone just pointed out that one of the lines got screwed up when formatting, and should actually read:

monkey38 47543 841.38 1.77