Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
 

what is loosen up to you?

you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats.

Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
 

[ QUOTE ]
what is loosen up to you?

you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

you can do better with 30/15

Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is loosen up to you?

you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

you can do better with 30/15

[/ QUOTE ]

couple questions...

sure you can make g's playing 30 15, but is it really a good idea to recommend it to someone struggling? deep end of the pool etc.

Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is loosen up to you?

you can do great in 200 nl 6m with 20 10 stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

you can do better with 30/15

[/ QUOTE ]

couple questions...

sure you can make g's playing 30 15, but is it really a good idea to recommend it to someone struggling? deep end of the pool etc.

[/ QUOTE ]
you're right

Re: Could I be a losing player at $200nl 6-max?
 

His numbers for 6max remind me of my full ring numbers before I quit that. Maybe I'm a loose bastard but I just can't imagine playing that tight.

I play 35-40% of my hands, but I think 25% would be fine for spongy.

PS I am talking out of my ass and know ver ylittle about stats, poker tracker, etc. The main thing is that he looks very tight and I kind of inferred weak tight which would be disastrous for 6max.