Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Are *'s taking it too far? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=397994)

tonypaladino 12-14-2005 05:29 AM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I like the * system. I hate it when every post in the forum has somebody else calling for the OP to get a *.

[/ QUOTE ]

*

Vavavoom 12-14-2005 05:32 AM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I like the * system. I hate it when every post in the forum has somebody else calling for the OP to get a *.

[/ QUOTE ]

**

[/ QUOTE ]

henrikrh 12-14-2005 06:54 AM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I like the * system. I hate it when every post in the forum has somebody else calling for the OP to get a *.

[/ QUOTE ]

***

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Jack of Arcades 12-14-2005 07:01 AM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
Well, we're nothing if not creative.

adamstewart 12-19-2005 07:32 PM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
[ QUOTE ]
The common misconception on 2+2 is that it was built for OOT, but let us not fool ourselves, 2+2 will and always be a poker forum.

As you browse the general poker forums you'll see posters (some good, some bad) with *'s in their name. I find it extremely moronic that posters who come to post on a poker forum are being banned and "given strikes" that can ban them from the whole of 2+2 because Astroglide thinks their "OOT" posts aren't funny enough.

I think the *'s are a good system and should be given to people who use offensive material and breaking the basic ToS...

[/ QUOTE ]


I completely agree with all of the above.

Quite frankly, this whole 'asterisk business' becoming a pathetic obsession for some.

I think OOT should remain as it was before, and those that belong to the 'moderating clique' can start a whole new Forum of their own - with all of its 5-7 members. They could even call it: The *** Forum.


Adam

Alobar 12-19-2005 07:34 PM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
who effing cares...you have a * under your name...so what??

people take internet message boards WAAAAAY to seriously

adamstewart 12-19-2005 07:35 PM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
[ QUOTE ]
who effing cares...you have a * under your name...so what??

people take internet message boards WAAAAAY to seriously

[/ QUOTE ]


You said it.


Adam

NotInchoateHand1 12-19-2005 07:38 PM

Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
 
Well, given that I have no astericks, but a banned account, I think the "*"s are a good idea.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.