Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=365118)

TimM 10-25-2005 08:30 PM

Re: work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ?
 
I have three words for something like this:

Random number generator.

Get everyone to do it too.

Imagine him trying to analyze the results.

Blarg 10-25-2005 08:42 PM

Re: work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I understand what you're saying and the logic behind it, but my experience has been very different.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure it has been. Not all work places are alike. As I recall, you have a very good job somewhere, right? And are a little closer to "above the line" than "below the line" when it comes to workers, that is, more likely to be viewed as an asset that strictly as a cost. It doesn't sound like Gorie's job is like that, or like her management thinks like that.

Blarg 10-25-2005 08:44 PM

Re: work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ?
 
I think what you're reading is that the vast majority of work environments are not like your own.

Aloysius 10-25-2005 09:25 PM

Re: work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I just don't get this. It's entirely possible that I have been exceedingly lucky in working at abnormally nurturing environments but I don't buy it. One thing I was taught very early on is to carefully manage your boss, i.e. make sure you both have the same understanding for what you are doing and what you want to do and all of that. I think what I'm reading here is that most people aren't even trying to do that.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm curious Sf'er what industry do you work in?

I've worked in i'banking, venture, now entertainment (all fairly cutthroat industries), so my personal suspicions of how "nurturing" a work environment are colored by this.

However - I have friends in a wide variety of industries - and from academia, to technology, to consulting... never, ever heard that the default work state is "nurturing".

Most people (co-workers whatever) are pretty self-interested. Succeeding in corporate america = someone else not succeeding. It's competition. How is it possible to have such a wholesome, nurturing environment at a work place? I find it difficult to imagine this truly existing.

Oh - and yeah - managing upwards is a really good thing to try and do. But I've found that it's much less about creating an understanding with your boss (for the greater good of the company) but much more about self-preservation and other selfish motives.

sfer 10-25-2005 10:52 PM

Re: work evaluation having to rate co-wokers ?
 
Banking.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.