DeLay Running Radio Ads Mocking Ronnie Earle
 

"DeLay's forces are now striking back at Earle. They're running a humorous, sarcastic ad on the radio about Earle and his partisan legal crusades. They've also subpoenaed Earle to appear in court to prove that he actually has some evidence to support his case and to explain irregularities in his conduct with jury members which may have led to unfairly influencing the outcome of his indictments."

I did not think this was possible but it appears that DeLay's defense team is even MORE CONFIDENT than I am that he will breeze through these sham proceedings....

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]



It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

Ditto! You may of left out one or two names.

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over-under?

-ptmusic

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]

Personally I'm just waiting for him to plea bargain.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno...after all, this IS the man who advocates threatening judges so they rule appropriately......

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over-under?

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

1.99

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over-under?

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

1.99

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take the under. I predict the number will be 1 (of the 4 listed above; indicted only, of course, no jail time or even losing a job. Probably the indicted will get a medal of honor.)

-ptmusic

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over-under?

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

1.99

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take the under. I predict the number will be 1 (of the 4 listed above; indicted only, of course, no jail time or even losing a job. Probably the indicted will get a medal of honor.)

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

cool, i'll take the over. i think 2 will be the final answer. statute of limitations is say 2010, but the crime would have had to have been committed before today.

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now that Ronnie Earle's indictment(s) have been revealed for the partisan hit job that they are, I notice that the libs on this forum havent said much. C'mon boys, lets hear your support for good ol' Ronnie Earle! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

It's cuz we are too busy waiting for the Cheney-Libby-Rove-Frist indictments!

[/ QUOTE ]

What's the over-under?

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

1.99

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take the under. I predict the number will be 1 (of the 4 listed above; indicted only, of course, no jail time or even losing a job. Probably the indicted will get a medal of honor.)

-ptmusic

[/ QUOTE ]

From former CIA agent Larry Johnson's blog:

"Had lunch today with a person who has a direct tie to one of the folks facing indictment in the Plame affair. There are 22 files that Fitzgerald is looking at for potential indictment . These include Stephen Hadley, Karl Rove, Lewis Libby, Dick Cheney, and Mary Matalin (there are others of course). Hadley has told friends he expects to be indicted. No wonder folks are nervous at the White House."

Re: Not hearing much on the Delay indictments suddenly
 

I love gossip as much as the next guy (especially regarding this White House), but I just read your post about a blog from a former CIA agent who spoke with someone who heard that Hadley told friends he expects to be indicted.

That's not exactly first-hand information! [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

-ptmusic