Re: 15-30 Online vs live
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My impression is that when I go and play live at the casinos or cardrooms in Sweden and play the equalent of 15-30 the opposition is a lot softer than online. Online 15-30, you're playing against other pros. Not saying that EVERYONE at 15-30 is a pro, but a lot more than live. Live 15-30 you're playing against restaurant owners, tourists, old people etc. It's a completely different game.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah. I find that the whole psychology is different. People I play with at the casino are there because they want to drink and gamble and have fun. People who play online are often doing it because they are serious about playing poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes I have played a lot of live in many places and it is basically a joke compared to the net. In my hometown the 15-30 is softer then Party 2-4 and its not even close!
Mike

Re: Pros, what\'s your biggest downswing?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Did you mix your signs up? You don't think it's possible to have a 600BB downswing with a vpip GREATER than 19%?

[/ QUOTE ]

Now I think I'm missing something. In my original post, I said that if your VPIP is less than 19 and you are beating the game fairly well, I don't think it is possible for you to have a 600 BB downswing. Someone with a higher VPIP would be more likely to have this size of a downswing. You question this, but it sounds like you are agreeing with me.

Maybe we are both confused??

- Jags

Re: Pros, what\'s your biggest downswing?
 

Well, there goes that theory then. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] Maybe I should stick to poker and stay out of the statisticians' way.

- Jags

Re: Pros, what\'s your biggest downswing?
 

Using 20,000 hands as the measurement period and using a 95% confidence interval, your standard deviation per hour/per table (per 65 online hands) would have to be north of 31 big bets...

said another way, there is 95% confidence that you will not get stuck 600 BB's over 20,000 hands if your standard deviation is 31 or less...