Re: Update
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Why are you getting all offensive? Alcohol is good for 3 things.
1. Get wasted.
2. Get laid.
3. You collect rare and expensive bottles of it.

If you want to get laid, it's understandable. If you want to get wasted, why are you buying expensive alcohol? Being drunk is being drunk whether it costs $20 or $200. You obviously are not a connoisseur. If you just wanted to try it out, there are bars that you can buy 1 drink to see how it is. But it says a lot if you have ask online how to drink a type of alcohol AFTER you paid for it.

[/ QUOTE ]

You should probably grow up.

Tony

[/ QUOTE ]

Tony, the guys comes off like a douche here, but after I thought about it, I tend to agree with him. If he wants a good bottle thats fine, but why? I personally dont like scotch, and am not adept at knowing what I like, so I would never buy an expensive bottle, unless it was to compare and contrast good/bad drinks. Now bourbon is a different story. But, I kind of agree, liquor is good for tasting if you KNOW what you like, or getting drunk. Obv by his first by the OP he doesn tknow what he likes

[/ QUOTE ]

Egoistic fallacy man

- Jags

Re: Update
 

coke....COKE...who the hell mixes scotch with COKE???
.
.
.
.
.
I always thought a busch chaser was the way to go...especially if its the blue label...

Re: Update
 

I don't think there's anything wrong with mixing one of the cheaper blends like JW red or Dewar's with Coke, but mixing a single malt or Johnny Blue is just a waste.

Re: Update
 

Friend of mine who used to waitress at a bar for the hip-hop crowd used to get massive tips for teaching the guys that Dom Perignon Mimosas were a waste of 2 C-notes. Fresh squeezed orange juice with decent champagne was much cheaper, tasted better, and got the same result.