Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Politics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Bush to nominate Alito to replace O'Connor (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=368805)

10-31-2005 11:55 PM

Re: Bush to nominate Alito to replace O\'Connor
 
[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't it be hilarious if he was a vegetable, and there were instructions to let him die, but the republicans were forced to try and keep him alive.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you suggesting an updated version of "Weekend at Bernie's?"

(Or whatever the hell it was.)

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

BCPVP 11-01-2005 02:18 AM

Re: The qualifications...
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here are a couple of linky-dinkies concerning Judge Alito...

<ul type="square"> 1

2[/list]
Ignore the source. Just read the info.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here is how a liberal lobby group claims he stands on a bunch of issues.

http://media.pfaw.org/stc/AlitoPreliminary.pdf

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Nepa 11-01-2005 02:34 AM

Re: The qualifications...
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Here are a couple of linky-dinkies concerning Judge Alito...

<ul type="square"> 1

2[/list]
Ignore the source. Just read the info.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here is how a liberal lobby group claims he stands on a bunch of issues.

http://media.pfaw.org/stc/AlitoPreliminary.pdf

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Here is the lobby groups views.

http://www.savethecourt.org/site/c.m...muel_Alito.htm

http://images.pfaw.org/alito100.jpg

BCPVP 11-01-2005 04:15 AM

Re: The qualifications...
 
A distinction without a difference. Those same sentiments were expressed throughout the "report" by PFAW (that they mention TWICE). Honestly, how do you take something seriously when they can't distinguish between fact and opinion. Do you even know the difference?

Nepa 11-01-2005 09:22 AM

Re: The qualifications...
 
[ QUOTE ]
A distinction without a difference. Those same sentiments were expressed throughout the "report" by PFAW (that they mention TWICE). Honestly, how do you take something seriously when they can't distinguish between fact and opinion. Do you even know the difference?

[/ QUOTE ]

I know it is slanted to the left but I couldn't find anything that was put out by the righties that was that detailed. Most of the things that have been put out by the right only include one issue and only one issue. If someone could point me towards the link that is his Full record that is not put out by a leftly I would gladly read it. Personally, I don't think the right wants the american people to know his FULL record.

BCPVP 11-02-2005 07:18 PM

Re: The qualifications...
 
[ QUOTE ]
I know it is slanted to the left

[/ QUOTE ]
A huge understatement...

[ QUOTE ]
but I couldn't find anything that was put out by the righties that was that detailed

[/ QUOTE ]
This may be because liberal groups have been digging up everything they can about potential nominees in order to smear them. The nominee could probably have been just about any conservative choice and the "report" would have read the same.

[ QUOTE ]
If someone could point me towards the link that is his Full record that is not put out by a leftly I would gladly read it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Here's a start.
And another
It's really not that hard. Google is your friend.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.