Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

What are peoples cutoffs for raising here, 66, 77? Bigger?

Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

[ QUOTE ]
What are peoples cutoffs for raising here, 66, 77? Bigger?

[/ QUOTE ]

This question also makes me realize that part of the answer depends on my own image. If I have a tightish image, I might raise 66; with a looser image, I might need 88.

Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

I'd limp here. The players do not seem all that wild as a group pf. If you were sitting a a table where hands were 3betting and capping pf a high % of the time... then I'd muck. If you expect to have to call 2+ (when it comes back around) a majority of the time, 3 or 4 way contested...then I think you should start mucking. You would then essensially be geting 4-1 or 3-1 a majority of the time (and an expensive 4-1 or 3-1 at that)... which is getting further and further away from the odds of hitting a set.

Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

Agreed. With one limper I root for more limpers behind me. If there were no limpers ahead, I would raise or fold hoping to get heads up.

Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

77 or bigger. Limp all smaller pairs.

Re: Preflop: Hijack PP vs. limper
 

Wow, I think limping is easily the worst of your options. 44 Plays like crap multiway and you don't have implied odds to hit your set. Raise or fold.