Re: The way the college football post season should look
 

They need playoffs bottom line. When they have that I will start watching these bowl games.

Re: The way the college football post season should look
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, you're going to actually sit there and try to say that Denver is worse than Miami?

Are you surrious?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I failed to notice the change to NFL. Of course Denver is better than Miami. I say that because of results form games that have actually played. Not because of some extranous data (like MOV).

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, but Miami crushed Denver in the opener.

Re: The way the college football post season should look
 

How about a 16 thread playoff for the best thread about how College football should be.
It might be hard to get down to 16 threads though.

Re: The way the college football post season should look
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait, you're going to actually sit there and try to say that Denver is worse than Miami?

Are you surrious?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I failed to notice the change to NFL. Of course Denver is better than Miami. I say that because of results form games that have actually played. Not because of some extranous data (like MOV).

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, but Miami crushed Denver in the opener.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you only considering one game?

I am considering the results of all games that have been played, and nothing else.

It doesn't take a fancy computer predictor to show that Denver is better than Maimi. Just look at their win / loss record.

Re: The way the college football post season should look
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why are you only considering one game?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what I've been asking you all thread.

[ QUOTE ]
I am considering the results of all games that have been played, and nothing else.

It doesn't take a fancy computer predictor to show that Denver is better than Maimi. Just look at their win / loss record.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, it's a good thing everybody plays the same schedule as everybody else, right? And it's a good thing every win is equally indicative of a team's ability, right?

NOBODY ranks people by W/L records alone. Everyone adjusts for competition, margin of victory, how a team looks, etc. It's just that a computer does it much better than we can.