Re: New party \"Speed\" sngs
 

[ QUOTE ]
Look at 10 tournies that you won use some random selection method. Look at the first hand of level 4. Post number of below average and number of above average.

I would bet that you are below average overall.

[/ QUOTE ]
Random 10: above average at start of level IV 4/10; above average at start of level V 6/10. In both cases, average chips held at beginning of level was above average chip count: 1.24 x average stack at start of level IV and 1.33 x average stack at start of level V.

Not that any 10 game sample is going to prove anything.

Re: New party \"Speed\" sngs
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Look at 10 tournies that you won use some random selection method. Look at the first hand of level 4. Post number of below average and number of above average.

I would bet that you are below average overall.

[/ QUOTE ]
Random 10: above average at start of level IV 4/10; above average at start of level V 6/10. In both cases, average chips held at beginning of level was above average chip count: 1.24 x average stack at start of level IV and 1.33 x average stack at start of level V.

Not that any 10 game sample is going to prove anything.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I am gald that I did not bet any cash on my part

[img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]

I figured a random sample would encourage you to take a look. Thanks.

I could perhaps improve my game by playing some more hands early then.

--
tjh

Re: New party \"Speed\" sngs
 

[ QUOTE ]
I could perhaps improve my game by playing some more hands early then.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's not the only way to get chips early on. My VP$IP is around 13% in levels 1-3. Sometimes it's not a matter of winning more chips but rather losing fewer. (Not that my example is one to follow.)