Re: Set of 3s at NL400
 

[ QUOTE ]
Is this incorrect or is it best to just fold this turn to the raise?

[/ QUOTE ]
its incorrect if you are almost 100% sure he doesnt have a higher set and will pay of a push on the river.

But it makes the river much easier to play of course because you dont have to play it...

Re: Set of 3s at NL400
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is this incorrect or is it best to just fold this turn to the raise?

[/ QUOTE ]
its incorrect if you are almost 100% sure he doesnt have a higher set and will pay of a push on the river.

But it makes the river much easier to play of course because you dont have to play it...

[/ QUOTE ]

You're telling me that if people flipped over their cards you would always make the right decision? No way. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Well, it's a multi-way raised pot with a load of broadways. Can you explain calling the turn raise and then folding the river then please?

Re: Set of 3s at NL400
 

Beacuse I have the odds against a straight (including implied) and on the river I folded because he bets even if the flush came there (I might have had a flush in his eyes and a sort of combo straight + spade draw in his hand is not impossible, not very probable though).

Re: Set of 3s at NL400
 

lead the flop
you can't fold the river with those odds
your play makes no sense... if you think you are beat, fold teh turn. if not, shove the turn.

Re: Set of 3s at NL400
 

Definitely bet that flop... There are a multitude of made hands that will give you action and a bunch of draw hands that will give you action. You also need to defend against those drawing hands.