Re: AA party 2/4
 

I'm starting to like the bet, to make him make a move on the pot. Like you said, it's quite unlikely that he plays a flopped set or two-pair like this (check call, check agan). And a 9 might very well lead the turn as well.

If I bet, it's definitly bet call though. If I have to fold to a check raise (but the oponent is capable of making moves, just not quite enough that I can call the check raise), I'm still with checking behind. I don't see how that does not affect the decision. (Of course, if he is close to incapable of making moves, I have no problem bet folding.)

Anyway. Good discussion. Thanks. I am partially convinced.

Re: AA party 2/4
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm starting to like the bet, to make him make a move on the pot. Like you said, it's quite unlikely that he plays a flopped set or two-pair like this (check call, check agan). And a 9 might very well lead the turn as well.

If I bet, it's definitly bet call though. If I have to fold to a check raise (but the oponent is capable of making moves, just not quite enough that I can call the check raise), I'm still with checking behind. I don't see how that does not affect the decision. (Of course, if he is close to incapable of making moves, I have no problem bet folding.)

Anyway. Good discussion. Thanks. I am partially convinced.

[/ QUOTE ]

woohoo

Re: AA party 2/4
 

what about the implied odds of when he bets when he hits but would of folded to turn bet cause board paired, like flush draw, you bet 2/3 pot he folds, $20 positive, plus the $xxx he bets on river and you call.