Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   99. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=350838)

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 07:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
You honestly think a player with those stats plays these hands this way?

soah 10-06-2005 07:09 PM

Re: 99.
 
You don't have enough stats to draw any conclusions about his play.

But if you want to go by that, you say he is aggressive postflop. On this hand he has not taken a single aggressive action. The most logical assumption is that he is weak.

xorbie 10-06-2005 07:50 PM

Re: 99.
 
This is definitely a board I bet $5-$6 on the flop and $12 or so on the turn if he calls.

10-06-2005 08:09 PM

Re: 99.
 
I don't get why people bet the turn here, is it a value bet or a bluff? It doesn't seem to do have a good purpose.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 08:13 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't get why people bet the turn here, is it a value bet or a bluff? It doesn't seem to do have a good purpose.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?


[ QUOTE ]
You don't have enough stats to draw any conclusions about his play.


[/ QUOTE ]

Then how do you determine he'll check-call preflop and post with 76, 54, A8 and 55? Just guesses of what a typical SSNL player can have here?


[ QUOTE ]
But if you want to go by that, you say he is aggressive postflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, when did I say this? I'm super tired right now so my memory may be a bit hazy. I can't find me saying he's aggressive.

soah 10-06-2005 08:16 PM

Re: 99.
 
You said: "Slightly LP preflop, but Agg postflop."

I would bet the turn because I believe I need to protect my hand, and it greatly reduces the chances that I will face a tough decision on the river.

10-06-2005 08:19 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?

[/ QUOTE ]

I still don't follow. The way I see it, he calls with better hands, he folds worse hands. It's good if he has a draw, but checking behind you are only giving up about 1/5 times when the draw hits on the river.

I guess if you know he doesn't have you beat it's a good bet, but from the info I have I'd wouldn't be certain enough.

amoeba 10-06-2005 08:22 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It's a draw heavy board. The draws missed, a scare card came, he checked, long hesitation.. take a pick?

[/ QUOTE ]

I still don't follow. The way I see it, he calls with better hands, he folds worse hands. It's good if he has a draw, but checking behind you are only giving up about 1/5 times when the draw hits on the river.

I guess if you know he doesn't have you beat it's a good bet, but from the info I have I'd wouldn't be certain enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just don't believe he happened to hit the K and I don't mind taking it down right there. also I want to keep my play consistent with times that I have say 56 there but want to represent the K and also keep it consistent with the times that I do have AK.

-Skeme- 10-06-2005 08:58 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
You said: "Slightly LP preflop, but Agg postflop."

[/ QUOTE ]

There it is.


[ QUOTE ]
I would bet the turn because I believe I need to protect my hand, and it greatly reduces the chances that I will face a tough decision on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

That works.

beset7 10-06-2005 10:01 PM

Re: 99.
 
[ QUOTE ]
You honestly think a player with those stats plays these hands this way?

[/ QUOTE ]

Its 55 hands bro. I'm sure even some of my 97/35/3 buddies could play 55 hands that way if they were distracted by the NFL game or something.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.