Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

I was and still am one of the best AOE conquerers players in the world. Top 500 at my peak in 2003.

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

Top 500 is one of the best in the world?

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

[ QUOTE ]
I was and still am one of the best AOE conquerers players in the world. Top 500 at my peak in 2003.

[/ QUOTE ]

DM or RM?

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

[ QUOTE ]
If we're talking AOE:2 + expansion, Spanish are the best and I don't think it's close.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are we talking RM or DM? Because in DM, which is what I played, Huns beat all other civs.

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

[ QUOTE ]
"Rules-based" physics are nowhere near as immersive or compelling as rules that let you do what you want and have it make sense instead of conform to some more or less arbitrary rule set.

[/ QUOTE ]

Would you consider chess to be nothing more than an arbitrary rule set?

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

I wouldn't consider it physics based.

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

[ QUOTE ]
I was and still am one of the best AOE conquerers players in the world. Top 500 at my peak in 2003.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was like 1950. By the way, huns are definately the strongest in RM and DM, but I always had a soft spot for the celts. Nothing like men at arms raping skirms.

Re: AGE OF THE EMPIRES
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I was and still am one of the best AOE conquerers players in the world. Top 500 at my peak in 2003.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was like 1950. By the way, huns are definately the strongest in RM and DM, but I always had a soft spot for the celts. Nothing like men at arms raping skirms.

[/ QUOTE ]

1950 in rated? I was 1900 in rated DM :P..not anymore though.