Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   I think this is right but scuba disagrees (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=406314)

Pasterbator 12-28-2005 02:33 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]

I take back everything I said btw...I thought the hero was the other short stack.. Now I have to reexamine. I believe I'd lean towards folding now, as SB should be tighter in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

HOORAY. I thought i had to relearn everything about SNGs. My stupid 324923 buyin downswing is making me read too much into everything.

ilya 12-28-2005 02:33 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]
Its a pretty easy call IMO against most decent players. To be honest I would never dream of folding in this spot in a $215. People who can't make ugly looking calls like this are going to have problems winning at sit and gos.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well the equilibrium here is something like 61%/31%, so I guess by a "decent" player you mean someone who will push more than is game-theory optimal because he expects BB to fold too much?

elcheapo 12-28-2005 02:33 AM

Re: Follow up
 
so this is a call with 2 paints, Ax or any pair?? If the stacks were reversed I call pretty quickly too.

curtains 12-28-2005 02:34 AM

Re: Follow up
 
Ok time to delete my ORIGINAL POST

GtrHtr 12-28-2005 02:34 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]

I take back everything I said btw...I thought the hero was the other short stack.. Now I have to reexamine. I believe I'd lean towards folding now, as SB should be tighter in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

thats good since I originally quoted you in my last reply. Didn't want to put words in your mouth though.

ilya 12-28-2005 02:34 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]
Ok time to delete my ORIGINAL POST

[/ QUOTE ]

sry, you posted follow-up while I was writing my post. folding as the other short stack would be silly.

Pasterbator 12-28-2005 02:35 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]
Please read my follow up post. I misread the HH.

[/ QUOTE ]

All over it. I'm a whole step ahead (or behind) you.

ZeroPointMachine 12-28-2005 02:39 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]

I take back everything I said btw...I thought the hero was the other short stack.. Now I have to reexamine. I believe I'd lean towards folding now, as SB should be tighter in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why should SB be tighter? What calling range are you assuming Scuba will put BB on?

jeffraider 12-28-2005 02:41 AM

Re: Follow up
 
wtf is scuba doing berating bad players!?!!?

ilya 12-28-2005 02:41 AM

Re: Follow up
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I take back everything I said btw...I thought the hero was the other short stack.. Now I have to reexamine. I believe I'd lean towards folding now, as SB should be tighter in this situation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why should SB be tighter? What calling range are you assuming Scuba will put BB on?

[/ QUOTE ]

Cos of the other short stack.

I am thinking Scuba would put BB on a 32-38%ish calling range if BB seems decent.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.