Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Hand to Talk About (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=55651)

Paluka 12-03-2003 03:02 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
I think that more blinds means you should tighten up your standards, not loosen them. Having more resistance more than outweighs the extra money. It should be obvious when you continue to add blinds. If 6 guys posted behind you, you don't raise it up with Q8o because of the extra blinds. I guess some might make the argument that the function is not linear- this could be the case because some hands play better multiway. With 6 blinds you might raise it up with 89s, but not with A7o. You can loosen up more in actual dead money situations like when people post a bb + a dead sb. The same concept works when you reduce blinds as well- on the button against just a big blind you can raise a lot of hands. You are against just one random hand plus you have position.
As for J9o, I think limping would be better than raising but I think I would fold.

nykenny 12-03-2003 03:45 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
By no means I am saying it is wrong to fold J9o in CO (cut-off, where did this term come from?). However, in a soft field, which describes the 10-20 game i usually play in, I am confident i can play J9o profitably against 3 blinds in position, so my first choice would be to raise, close 2nd would be to limp, especially so if i sense the Button is going to fold.

Kenny

ACPlayer 12-03-2003 03:53 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
Would it not be easier to play J9 off against a tight field then a soft field?

With a tight field you are more likely to know where you are then against a soft field. Also more likely to steal pot on many flops.

Gabe 12-03-2003 04:52 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
It's the type of hands you loosen or tighten up with that's relevant.

gonores 12-03-2003 05:48 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
How do you find threads from late 2001, early 2002?

karlson 12-03-2003 05:56 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
The search feature seems to work just fine.

Al_Capone_Junior 12-03-2003 07:40 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
It's basically a trash hand, plus you are virtually assured of two things:

1. if you raise you won't steal anything, you'll be playing trash for two bets against at least one opponent.

2. if you call you're almost certainly going to have three opponents to take on with your trash hand.

I see no problem here with folding.

al

elysium 12-03-2003 08:24 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
hi mason
i've been out of the loop for a while, it's good to be posting again.

i like the fold. there is little hope of getting everyone to fold and that's what you need to to have happen here.

skp 12-03-2003 08:36 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
While there may be no "problem" with folding, I don't necessarily see it as being clearly the best play (and perhaps you don't either...I am not suggesting that you do or don't).

One could call and simply use position at a later stage in the hand to win the pot (guys in early position are easier to read postflop when there has been no preflop raise). As for a raise, it too has something going for it. You may not be able to steal the blinds preflop but your raise may set up a steal on 3rd or 4th street.

I can see good viable arguments for folding, calling, and raising.

Duke 12-03-2003 08:39 PM

Re: Hand to Talk About
 
[ QUOTE ]
1. if you raise you won't steal anything, you'll be playing trash for two bets against at least one opponent.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably 3 bets.

But he does have position.

I think it's a lot closer than anyone seems to think. I think he'd actually raise this some of the time, just not this time with 4 to act after him.

~D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.