Two Plus Two Older Archives - Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit

Page 3 of 3

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)

- Small Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)

- - Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer! (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=370523)

11-03-2005 05:19 AM

Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!

The guy with KQ would have a dead Q and therefore it would not be a bad beat hand since you have to use both cards in the deck. Next time put (NC) in the post for no content

jason_t

11-03-2005 05:21 AM

Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!

[ QUOTE ]
The guy with KQ would have a dead Q and therefore it would not be a bad beat hand since you have to use both cards in the deck. Next time put (NC) in the post for no content

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Next time don't post it.

tonypaladino

11-03-2005 05:25 AM

Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!

[ QUOTE ]
If the dealer had thrown that card at you and a little higher and faster she could've severed your neck veins and killed you and I would've never had to read this post.

[/ QUOTE ]

sweet

baronzeus

11-03-2005 05:57 AM

Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!

[ QUOTE ]
If the dealer had thrown that card at you and a little higher and faster she could've severed your neck veins and killed you and I would've never had to read this post.

[/ QUOTE ]

$hant,

you are much cooler than shant.

TomBrooks

11-03-2005 06:51 AM

Re: Bad Beat Jackpot That Should Have Hit - Damn Dealer!

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Next time put (NC) in the post for no content

[/ QUOTE ]No. Next time don't post it.

[/ QUOTE ]
Next time PM it to me. I thought it was interesting.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Page 3 of 3

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page