Re: 6 handed 100/200, KJo in bb vs utg raiser
 

FPS.

-Diplomat

Re: 6 handed 100/200, KJo in bb vs utg raiser
 

[ QUOTE ]
Sometimes i like to for a check-call , donk bet the turn line. This only has merit if you can get a read on UTG and makes good guestimates to his hand range after the turn action. If you think he has a PP higher then 66, c/r the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

at lower limits you can donk the flop, get raised and donk the turn and get to 3bet. I imagine this would work well in more aggro games, but I could be wrong.

Re: 6 handed 100/200, KJo in bb vs utg raiser
 

[ QUOTE ]
go play some Settlers, nerd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey. Hey. Relax. Settlers was number one in 02!
Previous to that I was the champ of AOK

JT [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Re: 6 handed 100/200, KJo in bb vs utg raiser
 

[ QUOTE ]
The worst player at the table raises utg. This player is too loose, cold calls too much.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm always kind of curious about statements like these. How do you get to playing 100/200 at PokerStars by cold-calling too much? Are there people just really bad at theoretical poker at these levels or is cold-calling just a larger part of meta-game? The reason I ask is because I play mid-stakes limit (10-20 through 30-60) and there are very few hands that I cold-call a raise with and none that I cold-call a 3-bet with. At the limits I play, shania doesn't really matter because the opponents aren't very good but I assume that at 100/200 people would know better than to cold-call as much as you're making them out to be, but then again I don't play this high, and that's why I'm asking.

Re: 6 handed 100/200, KJo in bb vs utg raiser
 

I'd think that too. But we'd both be wrong.