Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

The only thing he ever did wrong was banning darynisright.

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought I was the only one that liked that account.

Re: hey {censored}
 

this thread is a direct violation of:
Rule 7.Threads about others posters are almost universally stupid. Especially nasty threads. Unless you are 100% sure that is it a good or funny story or something similar don't do this.

Also he cannot get your name right which is really a shame. He is also breaking the rule about posting on a topic related to your moderation of this forum.
People have been banned for less.

Edit: As Mason pointed out, the post was made 2 weeks ago. I seriously need coffee

Re: hey {censored}
 

This post was made 2 weeks ago before the rules were written down and fleshed out.

Re: hey {censored}
 

TSC doesn't know the difference between the { and the [.

{{{ [[[ [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] ]]] }}}

Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
This post was made 2 weeks ago before the rules were written down and fleshed out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you, I had not noticed the date. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: hey {censored}
 

http://www.hereinreality.com/funnyst.../brownnose.jpg

Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

btw i like TSC. i dont want him banned. just pointing out the inconsistency in [censored] ‘s decision to only ban people who start threads who disagree w/ his moderating decisions.

[censored], could you give your reasoning?

bwana

Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

[/ QUOTE ]
How about it is something like 2 weeks old?

Furthermore, [censored] isn't obligated to explain himself to anyone. Personally, I think he should ban RacersEdge for the retarded bump.

EDIT: OK, as said in another thread, I'm an idiot. It looks like I was out of line. Apologies.

Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
keep it up, you are doing a god job, fcuk all the haters just ban them because they all suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

btw i like TSC. i dont want him banned. just pointing out the inconsistency in [censored] ‘s decision to only ban people who start threads who disagree w/ his moderating decisions.

[censored], could you give your reasoning?

bwana

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, um, this thread hasn't been locked or any bans partially because it is in the sticky as 'A basic [censored] sucks thread'. No need to bump or add to it.

Re: hey {censored}
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
im not sure how this post is not a bannable offense. [censored] is banning anyone who starts new threads on his moderating decisions and has made that clear.

[/ QUOTE ]
How about it is something like 2 weeks old?

Furthermore, [censored] isn't obligated to explain himself to anyone. Personally, I think he should ban RacersEdge for the retarded bump. Did he actually dig through 20 pages or whatever of OOT just to bump this? Christ. But whether he does or doesn't, I'm not somehow entitled to know his reasoning.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is one of the threads [censored] links to in his sticky as a thread to express opinions on the job he is doing.