Re: FCP > 2+2
 

Yep.

Very good advice there

Re: FCP > 2+2
 

Just had a look at it. It's comparable I guess.

This thread - 'you know know your playing a fish when...' made me LMAO

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...ic.php?t=13874

Esepcially the one where a player lost to an AA when he had AK, and was surprised, cos the AA had 2 outs, whilst he had 6...

hehe

Re: FCP > 2+2
 

[ QUOTE ]
Yep.

Very good advice there

[/ QUOTE ]

nh

Re: FCP > 2+2
 

First, 2+2=4. F+C+P does not equal 4. 2+2 is therefore better using deductive reasoning.

Second: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...ic.php?t=10747

Edit: Third: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...amp;highlight=

enough said.

Re: FCP > 2+2
 

The absolute best part about FCP, is when the guy who advocates both, folding when you can check and get a free card, and for making three of a kind only "count" when you have a pocket pair hitting a set, defends his positions by stating: "Oh wait...this isn't a learning forum? I forgot, it's a Sklansky-bot's-R-us forum. Whoops." Priceless.

http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poke...ic.php?t=13874

Re: FCP > 2+2
 

Is this one of Daniel's aliases?