Re: 400nl hand- laying down a set
 

I'm not as convinced it's an easy call. I might well call with TT to (a) check that no flush card came on the turn and (b) sucker someone in. It's also reasonably likely the cutoff had 34s and obviously called on the flop, now hits the straight and wants to force out flush draws.

Let's give the villain some respect here - I think you'll be shown 34 (or TT) a lot more often than other posters think.

Re: 400nl hand- laying down a set
 

[ QUOTE ]
Let's give the villain some respect here

[/ QUOTE ]

Nah, it's $2/4 Party NL!!

Re: 400nl hand- laying down a set
 

[ QUOTE ]
He's beat by AA, TT, and 43. He beats AT, A5, A2, 22 and AJ-AK. Villain push-raises all in on turn when the A hits, does this look like a monster? Not to me. Folding cannot be correct here.

[/ QUOTE ]

In addition, villain is CO, so AA and TT are exceedingly unlikely, because most villains raise these from CO.

Easy call, if you're beaten so be it.

Re: 400nl hand- laying down a set
 

Bad laydown. If the opponent actually ahd the straight, I doubt he'd go all in on the turn. Opponent has two pair or a set of 2s.