Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Tasty...1,112 in rake

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Imagine how well you could do if you weren't a total rock. Way to run good though.

-DeathDonkey

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Play much? That's close to 2,000 hands a day.

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

I play 8 tables at once. I'll play 400 hands, take a break, play 400 hands, take a break, etc..

To the poster that said I'm a rock that's just runnin good: ,,l,,

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Man, I can relate. I feel I play decently and consistently beat the .50/1.00 tables at Party, BUT not for the big money like some of the other posters.

My biggest problem, I think, was my lack of aggression on later streets - that's where the money is.

So yeah, I'd make some money, get up 50-100 BB, then have runs of bad luck and be back down around even. (I have fateful, fateful, heartbreaking down swings during which I magnify my problems by clinging to marginal hands.)


I once thought that reads were unnecessary at this level. I mean these guys are all fish, right? Well, now I feel reads at this level are just as important, if not more, than at any other level. You experience so many different types of players here: anywhere in the spectrum between calling stations and maniacs; so you have to know how each of these players play their hands so you know how to react back.

Admittedly, I still make too many mistakes, i.e. aggression in the wrong spots, focusing on what I'm holding instead of what my opponents probably hold, wussing out on later streets, etc... But, it is getting better, and you will too.

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Get a life!

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Dude your stats are rockish.

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Rockish? As in the Tight-Passive-Passive boulder icon in pokertracker? Or rockish as in your VP$IP is very low compared to the 18-20% that we here at 2+2 Micro-Limit Forums preach as gospel?

My post-flop aggression numbers:
Flop: 2.14
Turn: 2.10
River: 1.92

Total: 2.04

I don't agree that these are rockish stats.

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

Your vpip is 13.72, w$@sd at 62.42, pfr at less than 7. You also fold your blinds to steals over 90% of the time. I'm not telling you how to play, but I think you could be winning more.

Re: Does anyone here actually beat PP .5/1 consistently for alot???
 

</font><blockquote><font class="small">En réponse à:</font><hr />
To the poster that said I'm a rock that's just runnin good: ,,l,,

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, don't listen to DeathDonkey. He doesn't know what he's talking about. You're play would be better if you just put him on ignore now. <font color="white"> moron </font>