Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 

you have more experience in that game than I do but within 1 of 3.68 is ridiculously high. only the best players at 10/20 are worth that much. I don't think you can put him in that category by simply looking at his stats. you have no idea how he plays

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 

[ QUOTE ]
you have more experience in that game than I do but within 1 of 3.68 is ridiculously high. only the best players at 10/20 are worth that much. I don't think you can put him in that category by simply looking at his stats. you have no idea how he plays

[/ QUOTE ]

First of all its 5/10. Secondly, you're right I technically don't have any idea how he plays because I have not seen him play. But based on the information I do have (his stats), I feel like I can say with a decent level of confidence that he is a solid shorthanded player. He obviously thinks hes playing good, and he made this post to see if others would agree and since we arent all going to watch him play for a few hours, he shows us the next best thing. Based on the next best thing to watching him play, I am indicating that I agree with his suspicion that he is playing well. I guess we will just have to wait another 990,000 hands and have him get back to us so we can know for sure [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: 1st 10k of 6max
 

oops, thought it was 10/20. that makes a difference then