Re: The hardest level to play in $33s and below on Party?
 

No you're not. I have neg chip EV (-.03 BB per hand, very negative) at level 3 over my last 200 sng's, and it's really annoying. I'd also like to hear some more advice on playing it.


That's a maximum of 2000 hands, not worth worrying about yet.

Level 3 is also my answer. I don't have anything more to add than the reasons already in this thread, I get a hand I really don't want to fold, people are playing too aggressively for me to limp, and if I push, I'm only getting called if I'm beat but only picking up 75 chips if they fold.

Level 4 is like a mild form of level 3 for me (Seems the two are pretty much interchangeable in this thread) as the 'mistake' of pushing at least picks me up 150 chips if everyone folds.

Lori

Re: The hardest level to play in $33s and below on Party?
 

This is just a thought, but has anyone tried this reasoning at level 3? So level 4 I see lots of folks calling all-ins as they figure people are pushing any A,x or any two broadway cards because time is limited. Alas, they really drop their calling requirements. I wonder if you could pick up some chips if you lowered your push requirements in late position during level 3. I.e. you are CO, there is one limper and you get K,Q suited. Push here as you are not as likely to get a caller level 3 as you might at level 4? you gain t250 if you do this twice and then perhaps could tighten up during level 4? I don't know that I like this, but it is a thought.

Ryan