Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
Haha...all that said, this was a pretty bad spot for the Eagles before TO went down [/ QUOTE ] I dont see how. Andy Reid has an AMAZING record after a loss. (17-3 since 2000) I loved them to win outright beforehand (I know, homer blah blah), and I don't LOVE them now, but still think that they will. Why don't you make a CCx-play in your picks with a unit on the ML [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
Let the Reggie Brown era begin! [/ QUOTE ] It's a shame they let go Darnererererian McCants, I hope they've re-signed him [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Haha...all that said, this was a pretty bad spot for the Eagles before TO went down [/ QUOTE ] I dont see how. Andy Reid has an AMAZING record after a loss. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, with earlier teams that were better than the one currently playing for him. Washington was just humiliatingly shut out in a divisional game -- their focus for Sunday night is going to be unparalelled in the Gibbs 2 era. I'd prob argue the same regardless of who was going into FedEx. |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Let the Reggie Brown era begin! [/ QUOTE ] It's a shame they let go Darnererererian McCants, I hope they've re-signed him [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Speaking of FedEx...where's my fellow Bruin alumnus FredEx when needed? lol |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, with earlier teams that were better than the one currently playing for him. [/ QUOTE ] This is not true. He is 17-3 after a loss since 2000. Try not to lose too much money on the game if you bet it.. I'll do the same [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Yes, with earlier teams that were better than the one currently playing for him. [/ QUOTE ] This is not true. He is 17-3 after a loss since 2000. Try not to lose too much money on the game if you bet it.. I'll do the same [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Unless I didn't make myself clear, this doesn't make sense. If the team Reid is currently coaching is worse than his teams that held a record of 59-21 from 00-04, then the 17-3 number doesn't indicate anything about how this year's team will perform off a loss. |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
Unless I didn't make myself clear, this doesn't make sense. If the team Reid is currently coaching is worse than his teams that held a record of 59-21 from 00-04 [/ QUOTE ] I can read, thanks. My point was, there is no way that this is his worst team of the last 5 years. |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Unless I didn't make myself clear, this doesn't make sense. If the team Reid is currently coaching is worse than his teams that held a record of 59-21 from 00-04 [/ QUOTE ] I can read, thanks. My point was, there is no way that this is his worst team of the last 5 years. [/ QUOTE ] His teams of the last 5 years averaged a 12-4 record and none of them were worse than 11-5. There's a darn good chance this is worst team he's had during that period. I like the Eagles and Reid but really don't like this spot for them. Most of the handicapping I do relies on situational trends and this game pops up as a bad one. |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
His teams of the last 5 years averaged a 12-4 record and none of them were worse than 11-5. [/ QUOTE ] I think you're smart enough to know that a 12-4 team one year is not 'better' or 'worse' per se than an 11-5 team the next year - talent and schedule are two big factors in determining when teams are better than others. |
Re: if you\'re betting eagles/redskins
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] His teams of the last 5 years averaged a 12-4 record and none of them were worse than 11-5. [/ QUOTE ] I think you're smart enough to know that a 12-4 team one year is not 'better' or 'worse' per se than an 11-5 team the next year - talent and schedule are two big factors in determining when teams are better than others. [/ QUOTE ] Yes, of course. The Eagles have played a tough schedule this year but they've still looked relatively mediocre all things considered. Can you really say that about any of the 00-04 teams through the midpoint of the season? I suppose you could make an argument for the 00 team but that's it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.