Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
So you're saying you're immature. I assure you that contributes to your low winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

In most aspects of my life I don't think I'm immature, but at poker I definitley can be.

-SmileyEH

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

You rarely had a losing day playing 2k hands? That absinthe in Prague is good s[/i]hit, no?

Together, the following two statements make no sense.

[ QUOTE ]
over the summer havingn a losing day was rare as I was putting in at least 2k hands

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Playing 3-4k hands a week (while I was in Europe) made it easy to have a losing week

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you see why?

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

OK, that's my fair question then.

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher. Please don't patronize me. I realize this thread left me open for attack, but I felt it was worth it to get some feedback on how I play.

edit: If my true edge at 2/4 was 2BB/100 a losing day should occure once a week or so (2k hands each - I usually played more per day). If my true edge at 5/10 is 1.5BB/100 a losing week (4k hands) should occur every 3 weeks or so. 15sd and 17sd respectively.

-SmileyEH

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

To go from "it was rare" to "easy to have" is absurd.

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

To go from "it was rare" to "easy to have" is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you busting his balls? The 2/4 to 5/10 is a big jump. You should know as your tried the same jump.

The 5/10 is a tougher game 1BB/100 is not terrible. Many seemingly good players run worse than that. IT just means some adjustments have to happen.

HE is asking for help if you have personal problems with im take it to PM.

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

To go from "it was rare" to "easy to have" is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Next time I will just do the math instead of leaving room for semantic nitpicking. Sorry everyone.

-SmileyEH

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

To go from "it was rare" to "easy to have" is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you busting his balls? The 2/4 to 5/10 is a big jump. You should know as your tried the same jump.

The 5/10 is a tougher game 1BB/100 is not terrible. Many seemingly good players run worse than that. IT just means some adjustments have to happen.

HE is asking for help if you have personal problems with im take it to PM.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because I think that one of his main problems, and I'm being sincere here, is his attitude, his ego and his maturity level. The statements he has made about his game in the past and are making now are imo delusional.

My posts are not intended to be ball-busting. They are intended to point out what I think one of his main problems is. When he posts in OOT about Prague etc. we have a friendly dialogue; I state this to demonstrate that the posts here aren't part of some long-standing feud.

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because my edge in the 5/10 game is obviously lower and the variance higher.

[/ QUOTE ]

To go from "it was rare" to "easy to have" is absurd.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why are you busting his balls? The 2/4 to 5/10 is a big jump. You should know as your tried the same jump.

The 5/10 is a tougher game 1BB/100 is not terrible. Many seemingly good players run worse than that. IT just means some adjustments have to happen.

HE is asking for help if you have personal problems with im take it to PM.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because I think that one of his main problems, and I'm being sincere here, is his attitude, his ego and his maturity level. The statements he has made about his game in the past and are making now are imo delusional.

My posts are not intended to be ball-busting. They are intended to point out what I think one of his main problems is. When he posts in OOT about Prague etc. we have a friendly dialogue; I state this to demonstrate that the posts here aren't part of some long-standing feud.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really thought you hated this guy. Hard to tell over the internet.

Re: Have you played with me? 5/10
 

[ QUOTE ]

I really thought you hated this guy. Hard to tell over the internet.

[/ QUOTE ]

gg, I don't at all. Sincerely, go read our exchange in OOT from about a month ago.