Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

While your reasons for not raising preflop are cogent, I don't like them at all.

1. The tard with AK: this is a pattern recognition thing. AK doesn't raise to 45 UTG+1 very often. That's a tentative raise, and most donks don't play AK tentatively. I see min-raises with it, and over-raises with it. But a less than pot-sized raise from AK there is not something that a great player, nor a poor player will do too often. I'd scratch that fear from your list. It's just not a common betting pattern, not by a longshot.

2. Knowing how to get away from ace-high flops is much different than planning to get away from an ace-high flop. An ace is coming on a random flop less than a fourth of the time, and it's much less than that if there's one or more out. So why plan so heavily on this situation and why convince yourself you'll fold before you define some hands? The key to playing an ace-high flop with an underpair is getting a read on the ace. You can do this with both preflop and post flop pot manipulation. You have a little more work to do here preflop, and a hell of a lot more work before you resign yourself to folding to an ace-high board.

3. C-bets come from players who have betting impetus. If you take betting impetus preflop, you almost eliminate the c-bet. So, just change the point in time where you charge your opponent for overplaying his ace: instead of sticking his c-bet up his ass, you can charge him preflop and let him just give up post flop.

4. There isn't any betting sequence possible that would allow somebody to still have chips on the flop and not believe their JJ/TT is good on a baby board. Have you ever seen how pretty JJ is?

So, your preflop call is highly sub-optimal here in my opinion. In fact, I would say that you turn this hand into a negative EV hand playing it this way... and if you are playing QQ for a loss, you are doing it wrong.

Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.

Irieguy

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

[ QUOTE ]

Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll take a shot. 120.

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

<<Re-raising is a must here preflop. The amount of the re-raise is a pretty interesting discussion, too, and I think the correct amount lies in a very narrow range.>>>

I believe I would raise this too. Here is where we are pre-flop again:
<<Preflop: Hero is MP2 with Q, Q.
UTG calls t15, UTG+1 raises to t45, 1 fold, MP1 calls t45, Hero ?????>>>>
The pot at this point is sitting at t130, with a couple of players already committed for t45 and still 5 more players to act after your play. I would think we would like to have maybe one caller at this point, but really no more. How does a raise up to t150 sound? Then I guess the next question would be what happens if the initial raiser or first caller of t45 decides to push? Abandon the queens, I assume?
Les

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

Man, I like calling with QQ sometimes as well but smarter people are saying its a mistake, so it probably is. ZeeJustin listed the benefits of calling with QQ in a thread, but maybe that was in relation to deeper stacks in a MTT and not applicable to sitngos.

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

FWIW I think calling with QQ is fine here.

(Of course raising is perfectly fine too!)

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

I was in the midst of writing a response, but Irie pretty much covered it.

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

Anything u say is worth a lot actually.

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

What would you usually do?

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

I'm just going to chime in and say that the Unarmed/Irie threads have consistently been some of the best on this forum lately.

Re: $109s - QQ Hand
 

To raise or not to raise ... I will raise here 90% of the time (I like to vary my play which accounts for the other 10%).

I say the right amount is about 175. The worst thing you can do here IMO is make a wimpy raise that gets called in several places. One caller max is what I want here.

Interesting arguments for just calling though, Unarmed I love your posts, you always make me feel like I should be thinking more and surely that's a good thing. TY. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]