Re: Tough river call with low flush
 

[ QUOTE ]
villain didn't have tp..he had the FH, trust me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wouldn't the full have to be 55 or Q9 exactly? QQ doesn't make sense given the betting. Wouldn't a set or top two bet the flop?

I think this is a call.

Re: Tough river call with low flush
 

they might not given the number of people in the hand....they could think the flush is extremely likely. QQ isn't out of the realm of possibilities here, although I do consider it to be unlikely. Also this is the BB and he didn't have to pay to see this flop so 95 isn't out of the realm of possibilities either.

Re: Tough river call with low flush
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I three bet the turn for half his remaing stack.

Your reason for not 3-betting?

[/ QUOTE ]

Look at villains stats, the turn bet did not scare him off a bit. With three of the same suit to a flop, and a bet, a player with those stats will fold with anything vulnerable, this villain did not fold, he showed more strength. You will at times see a flush you beat, but not often enough to make any loot on it.


Cambraceres

[/ QUOTE ]

if villian is as good as TAGish as suggested, then would he not put hero on a set, and slow down when the river pairs the board knowing his nut flsuh may be no good? i would imagine a check/call on the river by villain if that were the case. so, given your reasoning, do you think its possible to push all-in over his river bet, representing the full house, and get him to lay down his hand? or is heros remaining stack too small for this move?


not saying my line is any good, just trying to understand why several people strongly disagree with it...