Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

[ QUOTE ]
You know what questions to ask, but it's not easy to come up with answers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thinking about the situation is much more valuable than the answer.

[ QUOTE ]
He could easily have AQ here. KK is also possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

How often do they limp/call those hands? You think a player who limp/calls AQ or KK is going to often raise here?

If you're going to assume something about a player, make it be consistent throughout the hand.

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

[ QUOTE ]
... these hands aren't getting any better...

[/ QUOTE ]

Then, I guess you should simply be not reading any of these threads.

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

Probably the toughest early stages post flop decision I had all session. Thank you so much for posting it. Did I think he had TT or 99? No. It's tough to make a set, so my general rule in holdem is that if the only hand I am beat by is an extremely unlikely set, they get paid. I thought AT and A9 much more likely. AQ also possible, as is T9 and AJ. Who said KK? Go back and reread the hand. What odds am I getting? 845-2035,about 1.5 to 1, somewhat less when I have the best hand and my opponent folds. So the guy raised a 100 bet to 275. He didn't raise it to 200, he didn't raise it to 300. He raised it as much as possible without making it look like a big raise and not making it obvious (he could have made it 295). This with an A on the board, the PF raiser still to act behind him and the bb making a 2/3 pot bet. Would you take +150 that he had AQ and AJ vs. AT, A9, T9, TT, and 99? At the time, I decided not to. Looking at the decision again with lots of time (right now), I am even more confident that the fold was correct.

Thanks again for all the replies.

moses

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

I missed another point. The 845 chips I will lose are worth more per chip than the 1245 I might win. This skews the odds. How much more are those chips worth? Anyone who can correctly answer that question would be an AWESOME player. Becuase I don't think anyone has been able to prove it mathematically. ie no one knows for sure.

moses

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I am puzzled. What did he put him on? TT or 99?

[/ QUOTE ]

Never played a $215, but I'd say his range is obvious and narrow for the majority of players. Just sit and think of what hands play this way.

For the ones you beat, how much are you going to lose? How will the hand play out? How probable is it he has one of these versus one of the ones you beat? What are your outs?

For the ones you beat, how much value are you going to extract? How will the hand play out?

I think the answer is obvious.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, it's not. You know what questions to ask, but it's not easy to come up with answers. He could easily have AQ here. KK is also possible.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ouch ! Did I say KK there? I must be smoking crack.

Moses, thanks for the insight. I probably would have pushed there.

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

what limit is this?

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

[ QUOTE ]
what limit is this?

[/ QUOTE ]

200/15

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

Doesn't your lack of aggression here make his range much wider for the hands he could have?

I mean he raised a standard 3 times and then you just called (not the normal play with AK) the villian raised on the flop because he just smooth called his raise preflop, you haven't represented the hand that you have, that is why the villian is raising your bet.

I push but maybe I am just newb that doesn't know what he is doing

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

Your thoughts are good, but they don't pertain terribly much to this hand. Reread the posted hand.

moses

Re: Moses (Custer) hand #2: Folding TPTK
 

ahh yes I did F it up, I still go broke though.