Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=384337)

amoeba 11-24-2005 04:09 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
no badbeat jackpot?

unfortunate.

yvesaint 11-24-2005 04:10 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
[ QUOTE ]
no badbeat jackpot?

unfortunate.

[/ QUOTE ]

even so, wouldnt you need to use both your cards?

amoeba 11-24-2005 04:12 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
no badbeat jackpot?

unfortunate.

[/ QUOTE ]

even so, wouldnt you need to use both your cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

hmm yeah. most of the time at least.

edge 11-24-2005 04:24 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
Yeah, calling is pretty bad. This is a weird spot, and an expert move would probably be to fold the river for a pot bet too. I doubt I could fold for a dime, but for eight it seems pretty easy.

SpaceAce 11-24-2005 05:09 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
[ QUOTE ]
CALL. EASY CALL.


Tex

[/ QUOTE ]

Not only is this not an easy call, this is no call at all in my opinion. I can't believe the number of people here who seem willing to call $8,000 in what was previously a $900 pot. What is all this emotional attachment to quad Aces? Yeah, quads are normally a very strong hand but everything has to be measured against the board and against that board and an $8,000 bet, quad Aces aren't so strong.

This has to be a bluff an awful lot to make calling correct and if it IS a bluff, you shouldn't have too hard a time getting the money from the bluffer later on.

SpaceAce

integrate 11-24-2005 10:00 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
Ouch.

I don't know if I'd be able to lay this one down. But with respect to the pot being only $900 when the guy goes all-in for $8K? That'd sure as hell make it easier to fold.

Hattifnatt 11-24-2005 10:16 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
Super clear fold by all means with AAAA.

11-24-2005 10:22 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
This is the type of hand that would give me crazy butterflies just thinking about calling. It would definitely depend on what mood I was in.

Tears

Bosox 11-24-2005 10:45 AM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
This hand was played terribly regardless.

mgsimpleton 11-24-2005 12:12 PM

Re: Sweating Commerce 20/40: AAAA No Good? Or are they? (LC-ish)
 
the thing that leads me towards a call with AAAA is that this is such an easy bluff with the naked J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.