Re: How much aggression is right?
 

[ QUOTE ]
thank you for your comments. I realize that the AT suited raise is wrong. Those clubs just looked so purty at the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the fact that it is "purty/suited" makes this a strong preflop holding and is worthy of a value raise. The Ace alone makes it strong HU against a limper.

Why do you think the raise is wrong? Work your argument for not raising and see if it holds up in your own mind.

Re: How much aggression is right?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Raising this flop is a perfect example of bad aggression...I'm comfortable with folding this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't really understand this comment???

A suited Ace high with good kicker against one limping opponent and you wouldn't raise.

Seems like you would be ahead preflop a majority of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

we're ahead a lot pre-flop yes, but when we get bet into on this all-diamond flop by the limper, we're unlikely to be ahead. What happens when the A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] falls?

Re: How much aggression is right?
 

/grunch/
Hero folds.

Re: How much aggression is right?
 

Grunch.

PF raise is fine. Though there is a reasonably good chance villan is bluffing (many fish would check-raise here, or check-call and check-raise the turn if they flopped a flush) I still wouldn't call.