Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
i already post too much so of course i am for it [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

this was a weak 3k post.

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

i don't do 1K/2K/3K milestone posts.

usually i just post a hand in mid/high [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img].

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

15 minutes? That's like 6 or 7 posts for Jake. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

I was the guy who posted the video yesterday, and I thought the parellels between somethingawful's message board and OOT were really interesting. The guy that was left in charge of somethingawful's message board was their [censored], and the results were the same -- a better board for the vast majority of the "regulars".

The 6:00-6:15 banning idea was cute. However, I'm sure that [censored] can come up with something original if he felt that such a thing were needed. I think OOT is under control now, though...no need for anything gimmicky at the moment.

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
At first, I was very skeptical in [censored]'s new power.... I figured he'd go overboard powertripping....

But I must say...I think things have gotten much better. Thread quality has gone up since he assumed the role of authority.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
I know OOT is in a much better state now, but perhaps we could introduce something like this to further weed out the chaff who can't read.

What says ye?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where exactly would you post this that people should see it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I know OOT is in a much better state now, but perhaps we could introduce something like this to further weed out the chaff who can't read.

What says ye?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where exactly would you post this that people should see it? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Er, in a sticky? Prominent enough so that most would see it, but obviously not all. Let the mayhem begin.

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

I think it would be better if there was no post, and the time was randomized.

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
Er, in a sticky? Prominent enough so that most would see it, but obviously not all. Let the mayhem begin.

[/ QUOTE ]

The people that post here reread all the stickies every day? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Er, in a sticky? Prominent enough so that most would see it, but obviously not all. Let the mayhem begin.

[/ QUOTE ]

The people that post here reread all the stickies every day? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF is up with your comprehension today? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

A fresh sticky, saying that throughout November, people will be banned if they post during a specific 15 minute period. No re-reading necessary.

Re: A suggestion to [censored]
 

[ QUOTE ]
WTF is up with your comprehension today? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

A fresh sticky, saying that throughout November, people will be banned if they post during a specific 15 minute period. No re-reading necessary.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just don't like the idea. But it won't make a bit if difference to me.