Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Probability (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=23)
-   -   Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=363564)

10-24-2005 12:23 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
This thread is so pointless, NOBODY regardless how great they think they are at playing BJ should be playing at PP.

imported_leader 10-24-2005 02:25 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
If this teaches you never to play BJ again, $400 was totally worth the cost.

Card08 10-24-2005 08:26 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
Good to see your bankroll management is going well after that post in the Psychology forum.

Justin A 10-24-2005 02:54 PM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
double anything 8 or higher when it beats what the dealer shows...

[/ QUOTE ]
That's wrong, sometimes by a lot. Never double down with an 8. (You lose about 0.27 bets by doubling down with 8 versus 7; 0.18 bets doubling 8 vs. 2.) Only double down with a 9 against 3-6.

[ QUOTE ]
split 8's when dealer shows 8 or lower...

[/ QUOTE ]
Always split 8s if the dealer has already checked for blackjack.

If you are going to play blackjack again, I think you want to take a look at a chart, and play on sites with a better rule set than Party. It'll be much cheaper. Of course, it is/was your money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah, I see you beat me to it while I was having a heart attack and writing. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

BTW, doubling 8 vs. 5 and 6 is correct in single deck play (which PP is not).

[/ QUOTE ]

Doesn't it also have to be against a house that stays on soft 17? I don't remember I haven't checked up on BS in a while.

BruceZ 10-24-2005 09:37 PM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, doubling 8 vs. 5 and 6 is correct in single deck play (which PP is not).

[/ QUOTE ]

Doesn't it also have to be against a house that stays on soft 17? I don't remember I haven't checked up on BS in a while.

[/ QUOTE ]

Basic strategy is to double regardless of whether the house stands on soft 17. A separate composition dependent strategy limits doubles to the exact cards (5,3) and (4,4). See The Theory of Blackjack by Peter Griffin, which has changes to basic strategy for rule variations and any number of decks.

Jerrod Ankenman 10-25-2005 08:15 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
[ QUOTE ]
I get the odds to be ..49^27

This just happened to me on party, and using between 5 and 25 dollar bets I just lost 400 dollars.... I got a few ties in there, like when I double my 11 to the dealers 6, get a 6, and the dealer flips an ace, this happened at least 4 or 5 times, which was better than the under card always being a 5 and the facecard always coming when I had 20

.49^27 = .00000043% or 1 in 231 million ... Sweet, is this the right calculation more or less, or do ties have something to do with it

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I did this playing BJ during the WSOP. Still won for the session. Bill Chen and Matt Hawrilenko witnessed it.

Jerrod

10-25-2005 09:02 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
I just lost 10 in a row on partypoker. Decided to put 10$ in and play 1$ hands for fun. Lost 10 in a row.

ddubois 10-26-2005 01:15 AM

Re: Losing 27 blackjack hands in a row
 
You should have used the martingale system. Then, after your $268,435,456 bet, you would have gotten your dollar of profit.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.