Re: Hand against Bart
 

You pay him off like an ATM. If he flinches at any point, bet.

Hello,Beer! FOLD! If u had him beat at this stage,
 

FOLDING is a small mistake. however , if he does have a set and u continue on,ur error would be MAJOR.
HappyPokering,
SittingBull
BTW,in my micro-limit games,I wouln't mind losing a few .25 just to see his hand.
However,when ur playing at 15/30 or higher,FOLDING in this case is USUALLY ur BEST option.

Results..
 

I folded. Bartholow claims he didn't have it. Personally, i think he had quads.

Sittingbull, when you read the opinions of Jeffage and Andy, do you still think that folding is the right play?

One reason why I think I should have called is cause bart is an observant player who knows I usually limp with live 3 flushes. Therefore, he may have been making a move to pick up a decent pot on fifth. And, he also knows I border on weak-tightness sometimes.

Thanks for everyone's thoughts.

Re: Results..
 

I think you are overthinking things. I raised with a live 3-flush with a couple of big cards in this hand. I wasn't trying to bully you or anything, I just wanted to raise for the usual reasons (though on pacific you don't thin players much, but you do build nice pots). Then I hit another ace and that's an automatic bet. It's true that if you had called you wouldn't have gotten much action later probably...

Re: Hello,Beer! FOLD! If u had him beat at this stage,
 

No, if Bart doesn't have trips, then Beer would be making a big FTOP mistake by folding. If Bart has trips, Beer is about a 3:1 dog. If Bart has only two pair, however, Beer is a 3:1 favorite. If Bart started with a three-flush or AKQ or something, Beer is an even bigger favorite. I suspect that Bart's range of raising hands is sufficiently broad that Beer needs to call down.